Abstract:This research paper uses the social capital perspective to revisit the much-discussed and as yet intriguing research question: the role of leadership behaviors in generating positive organizational attitudes and behaviors within the Asian context. The main purpose of this study is threefold: (1) to verify whether three leadership styles (i.e., servant leadership, ethical leadership, and participative leadership) contribute to enhancing organizational trust and commitment, (2) to test the full and partial mediating roles of organizational trust and commitment in the relationship between the three leadership predictors and organizational outcomes (i.e., in-role performance and managerial accountability), and (3) to probe indirect leadership impacts on performance and accountability outcomes. Using the alumni database (for 10 years, from 2001 to 2010) of the department of public administration at Zhejiang University, we constructed a survey (2011) (all items are selfreported: first round: 362 participants; second round: 300 participants; third round: 252 participants; valid sample size: 239 participants) that measured public employees` perceptions and behaviors in public organizations such as regarding leadership, commitment, HR policies, perceived organizational state, OCB, job tension, and trust. We employed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to operationalize the variables and confirm the latent constructs from the relevant survey questions. Second, to confirm the total direct and indirect effects, we employed a full structural equation model (SEM) (i.e., a measurement model with a path model) to test the interrelationships among variables and to assess the relative strength of each variable. The results of this study are interesting as they show that ethical and participative leadership behaviors are positively and significantly associated with organizational trust and commitment in the Chinese public sector. Based on a discussion of the main findings, various research and practical implications for public management theory and practice are provided.

Four Challenges to Accountability in Contemporary Public Administration: Lessons From the United States and China

Review on Theories of Accountability

Public management in China: reform, innovation and governance

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Accountability and Motivation

Between Heaven and Earth: Dual Accountability in Han China

Notes on Contemporary Public Administration Theories in the West

On the Meaning and Basis of Administrative Accountability

CONTINUITY VERSUS CHANGE: EVOLVING TRAJECTORIES OF CHINESE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

The Roles of Integrative Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness in the Chinese Public Sector: A Research Note

On the Legalization of the Administrative Accountability in Drug Supervision

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: Public Administration Reform in China over the Last 30 Years

The New Public Management And A New Accountability

Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future

Opening the Door to Accounting Change: Transformations in Chinese Public Sector Accounting

Deepening Administrative Reforms:Three Key Issues

Governance and public administration in China

The Dilemma of "managing for Results" in China: Won'T Let Go

Opening the Door to Accounting Change. Transformations in Chinese Public Sector Accounting

Bureaucratization,De-Bureaucratization and the Balance between the Two:an Understanding of the Public Administration Reform in Western Countries

Approaches to the Legitimization of the Organization of Public Administration