Abstract:Land policy making is a complex systemic process in which new policies emerge and are nonlinearly transferred. However, challenges remain, as the recent policy diffusion literature cannot match policy making to complex adaptive systems. This study elucidates the conjunctural causal mechanisms of local policy innovation and diffusion in China. To analyze the differences in China's land reform, a theoretical framework is established that includes four key conditions-incentive rules, local context, vertical governmental coercion and interregional diffusion-as well as three analytical principles, namely, nonlinearity, conjunction and intersection. Then, an archetype analysis based on the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method is conducted on 119 city governments that implemented land retention policies during the period of 2000-2019. The results systematically associate local policy action with five theory-based archetypes, each with its own narrative expression ("risk aversion", "reform pilot", "political learning", "induced competition", and "social evolution"). This article reveals that 1) China's administrative institutional structure shapes the reform motivation of local governments and their interaction with the central government, and the performance evaluation system for officials plays a key role in this dynamic; 2) local contexts can limit or amplify coercive and learning mechanisms, and policy knowledge can impede diffusion under certain conditions; and 3) the combination of archetypes occurs at three levels: theoretical mechanisms, conditional elements, and factor combinations. Overall, the study shows how multilevel factor interactions influence the decision-making process for China's land reform. These findings can serve as useful references for conjunctural causation research on policy innovation and diffusion in China and assist local decision makers in other countries in transition in developing sustainable land policies.

Policy Experiments:Start -up Mechanisms and Internal Logic---Case Studies on the Performance Management Policies in China’s Public Sectors

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central–Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China

Experiment-based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? the Case of Urban Housing Reform in China

Comparison of Policy Experiments: Practices in Asia

Policy Experimentation As Communication with the Public: Social Policy, Shared Responsibility and Regime Support in China

Go East, Young Cadre: Experiments in Inter‐Provincial Training of Party and State Managers in China

The Trying Game: Policy Experimentation According to Institutional Environment in China’s Education Reforms

Experimentation, Policy Learning, and China's Education Reforms

Policy Experimentation and Power Negotiation in China’s Higher Education Reforms

‘FROM POINT TO SURFACE’: THE ROLE OF POLICY EXPERIMENTATION IN CHINESE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS

From Local Experiment to National Policy:Using the Rural Pension Policy as an Example

District Government As a Policy Entrepreneur: Understanding Policy Experimentation in China's Wujin District

Policy Innovation of Local Officials in China: the Administrative Choice

Land Policy Making in a Complex System: the Innovation and Diffusion Logic of China's Retained Land Policy Reform

Seeking performance or control? Tethered party innovation in China’s performance evaluation system

Inter-regional Diffusion of Policy Innovation in China: A Comparative Case Study

China’s Experience in Public Policy Implementation

Policy Synthesis Through Regional Experimentations: Comparative Study of the New Cooperative Medical Scheme in Three Chinese Provinces

Mission-Driven Agency and Local Policy Innovation: Empirical Analysis from Baoding, China

Behavioral Patterns of Expert Participation in Social Policy Changes in China