Abstract:Land policy making is a complex systemic process in which new policies emerge and are nonlinearly transferred. However, challenges remain, as the recent policy diffusion literature cannot match policy making to complex adaptive systems. This study elucidates the conjunctural causal mechanisms of local policy innovation and diffusion in China. To analyze the differences in China's land reform, a theoretical framework is established that includes four key conditions-incentive rules, local context, vertical governmental coercion and interregional diffusion-as well as three analytical principles, namely, nonlinearity, conjunction and intersection. Then, an archetype analysis based on the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method is conducted on 119 city governments that implemented land retention policies during the period of 2000-2019. The results systematically associate local policy action with five theory-based archetypes, each with its own narrative expression ("risk aversion", "reform pilot", "political learning", "induced competition", and "social evolution"). This article reveals that 1) China's administrative institutional structure shapes the reform motivation of local governments and their interaction with the central government, and the performance evaluation system for officials plays a key role in this dynamic; 2) local contexts can limit or amplify coercive and learning mechanisms, and policy knowledge can impede diffusion under certain conditions; and 3) the combination of archetypes occurs at three levels: theoretical mechanisms, conditional elements, and factor combinations. Overall, the study shows how multilevel factor interactions influence the decision-making process for China's land reform. These findings can serve as useful references for conjunctural causation research on policy innovation and diffusion in China and assist local decision makers in other countries in transition in developing sustainable land policies.

‘FROM POINT TO SURFACE’: THE ROLE OF POLICY EXPERIMENTATION IN CHINESE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS

Policy Experimentation and Power Negotiation in China’s Higher Education Reforms

Experimentation, Policy Learning, and China's Education Reforms

The Trying Game: Policy Experimentation According to Institutional Environment in China’s Education Reforms

Experimental Governance in China's Higher Education: Stakeholder's Interpretations, Interactions and Strategic Actions

Healthcare Reform in China: Making Sense of a Policy Experiment?

Experiment-based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? the Case of Urban Housing Reform in China

Policy experimentation and innovation as a response to complexity in China’s management of health reforms

China’s education policy-making: a policy network perspective

Policy Experiments:Start -up Mechanisms and Internal Logic---Case Studies on the Performance Management Policies in China’s Public Sectors

Dilemmas And Breakthroughs On Land Uses Policy In China: Policy Exploration

Policy Experimentation As Communication with the Public: Social Policy, Shared Responsibility and Regime Support in China

“The rising soft power”: An educational foreign exchange and cooperation policy conceptual framework in China

Go East, Young Cadre: Experiments in Inter‐Provincial Training of Party and State Managers in China

Experimentalist approach of Chinese legislation model: From passive response to institutional design

District Government As a Policy Entrepreneur: Understanding Policy Experimentation in China's Wujin District

Land Policy Making in a Complex System: the Innovation and Diffusion Logic of China's Retained Land Policy Reform

Learning From the United States?: Policy Transfer and the Development of Chinese Higher Education Since 1978

Educational reform in China: tensions in national policy and local practice

Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central–Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China

THE 'GAP' BETWEEN POLICY INTENT AND POLICY EFFECT: AN EXPLORATION OF THE INTERPRETATIONS OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN CHINA