Comparison of behavioral patterns of knowledge - experts participation in changes of national ambient air quality standard policy in China and America
Yan Sun,Hongyan Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2019.04.023
2019-01-01
Abstract:Since the 1960s,the Chinese government has issued multiple versions of Air Quality Standards Policy and related policies, in which experts frequently participated. As an important role in the policy subsystem,experts are one of the important factors influencing the change of public policy,in which the characteristics and behavioral patterns of expert participation,including the size,manner and result are all worth thinking about. This paper uses the comparative case study method,summarizes and compares the evolution of Air Quality Standard Policy between China and the United States,and analyses the behavioral patterns of expert participation and its impact on the process of Air Quality Standard Policy changes to find out the differences between two countries,which will provide some theoretical supports for the effective expert participation in the field of environmental policy in China. It is found that the behavioral patterns of linear access and outside - in enlightenment exist in the two stages of policy change. However,there are also behavioral patterns of deprofessionalized campaign,and locked - out in each stage. Moreover, in the United States,the two patterns of linear access and outside - in enlightenment are basically balanced,while it is more stable to promote endogenous learning through the behavioral patterns of linear access to promote policy process in China. More generally,there are some similar effects brought about by expert participation on the process of Air Quality Standard Policy changes between two countries. However,the effect of expert participation in China has its own unique characteristics. First of all,expert participation is mainly based on the behavioral pattern of linear access,and it is different from the US where the behavioral pattern of outside - in enlightenment is the main one,which is inconsistent with previous research conclusions, the main reason is that Chinese policymakers pay more attention to the opinions of experts and stipulate the necessity of expert participation in relevant policies and laws. The behavioral pattern of linear access of expert participation can quickly and effectively influence policy - making and decision - making,however,under these circumstances,only a small range of experts can take effect,which leads to the result of more external experts lack effective ways or paths to participate in the policy process. Secondly,experts mainly promote endogenous policy learning and the transformation of secondary policy beliefs,which is particularly obvious in the first three stages of policy change,and only in the last stage,experts discussed and appealed for air pollution issues by publishing research results to the society,which showed the role of promoting social learning so as to promote the change of policy core belief system of policymakers. Thirdly,the composition types of expert participation tend to be diversified. With the democratization of policy concepts, more experts from non - governmental organizations joined in policy research. Along with the development of new media and social network,more experts participate in the policy process to respond to the requirement of scientific and democratic decision - making. Additionally,in the form of individuals,experts mostly play an important role in policy change in China,while American think tanks,as an important form of expert group,have a more profound and systematic impact on policy. The fourth point is that the ability of expert participation is still insufficient,and their role orientation is not clear. In the progress of Air Quality Standard Policy changes,the experts in China lacks the research on air quality standards with considering a more cutting - edge perspective and practical significance of long - term social development. Finally,the path and effect of expert participation lacks the guarantee of legal system,which caused that experts could not have a systematic and stable impact on environmental policy. This paper suggests that the government should continue promoting policy initiative change through encouraging the linear access of expert participation with forward - looking and sustained research,and constantly improve Air Quality Standards Policy and related policies so as to ensure long - term improvement of air quality. Meanwhile,experts need to fully understand the position and responsibilities of self - roles in environmental policy system,and actively explore effective strategies of policy participation.