Abstract:The Chinese party-state shares with other large, hierarchical organizations significant agency problems; local agents of the state tend to be have opportunistically, contrary to the interests of their principals. Such agency problems stem from conflicts of interest between principals and agents and from information asymmetries that typically characterize principal–agent relations. State officials in China employ a formal evaluation system (kaohe zhidu) to control the behavior of their subordinates. Drawing on principal–agent theory, this paper contends that the nature of the evaluation system helps to explain dysfunctional aspects of policy implementation at the grass roots and that problems with policy implementation, in turn, help to explain subsequent changes in the evaluation system itself. This characterization is consistent with adaptive learning on the part of principals. In the final section, the chapter argues that, paradoxically, even as the evaluation system has exacerbated problems in policy implementation, it has simultaneously contributed to the durability of rule by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Indeed, the relative stability of CCP rule, in contrast to the loss of power by communist parties in other former socialist states and contrary to claims of pervasive political decay in China, demands explanation. The chapter begins by providing some background on the development of the cadre evaluation system since the initiation of reform in 1978, arguing that changes in cadre evaluation represent an early and important element of political reform in China – albeit not democratic political reform. The next section analyzes the characteristics of the system in terms of principal–agent theory.

Tournament Style Bargaining within Boundaries: Setting Targets in China’s Cadre Evaluation System

Reassessing the Performance Evaluation System in the Xi Jinping Era: Changes and Implications

Target Setting in Tournaments: Theory and Evidence from China

The Elusive Pursuit of Incentive Systems: Research on the Cadre Management Regime in Post-Mao China

The Psychology of Local Officials: Explaining Strategic Behavior in the Chinese Target Responsibility System

Seeking performance or control? Tethered party innovation in China’s performance evaluation system

Scholars, strategists or stakeholders? Competing rationalities and impact of performance evaluation for academic managers in Chinese universities

Influence Activities and Favoritism in Subjective Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Party Management of Talent: Building a Party‐led, Merit‐based Talent Market in China

The Allocation Mechanism of Authority and Accountability in Chinese Government Hierarchies: A Case Study of the “earmarked Project System”

Does it pay to be a cadre? Estimating the returns to being a local official in rural China

China's Evolving Managerial Labor Market

Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China

State Ownership and Target Setting: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies in China*

Performance Ranking and Environmental Governance: An Empirical Study of the Mandatory Target System: Performance Ranking and Environmental Governance

The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grass Roots: The Paradox of Party Rule

Evaluation Processes, Local Cadres' Behaviour and Local Development Processes

Does Performance Matter? Evaluating Political Selection Along the Chinese Administrative Ladder

Accountability, Career Incentives, and Pollution: The Case Of Two Control Zones in China

Control, Discretion and Bargaining: the Politics of Provincial Leader Rotation in China

Can Bureaucrats Really Be Paid Like Ceos? Substitution Between Incentives and Resources among School Administrators in China.