Abstract:While corporate governance continues to play an important role in economic development, corporate governance issues are more complex in transition economies than in the developed market economies. Consequently, policy makers in transition economies have been busy attempting to establish a sound corporate governance system in their countries. This study uses China as a laboratory to explore corporate governance issues, as China is not only the most populous economy in the world, it is also undergoing transition from a socialist to a market economy since 1978. The need for strengthening corporate governance in the country has become all the more pressing as rapid economic growth has transformed the economy since especially the 1990s. China experienced a watershed in corporate governance when the split-share structure reform was introduced. Hence, we analyse in this thesis the impact of this reform on board composition, firm performance, and firm risk over the period before and after the introduction of the reform. Firms are classified by ownership into central government, local government, state owned enterprise (SOE) and privately controlled firms based on ultimate controlling shareholders. The study deploys static and dynamic panel data estimation methods to examine the determinants of corporate board composition, relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance, and the relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm risk. The results show that Chinese corporate board composition is jointly determined by the scope of operation (resource dependent theory), monitoring (agency theory), bargaining (power theory), other governance mechanisms (stakeholder theory) and regulations (institution theory). The government was the most important player in constituting board composition before the split-share structure reform was introduced, but independent directors became more important than other governance mechanisms after that. Private firms and SOEs are more concerned about cost than other factors when adding independent directors. Also, corporate board exerts a positive influence on firm performance once the share of independent directors reached 30 percent. Although the supervisory board can make up for the inadequate number of independent directors, its role became insignificant after the reform. Central government controlled firms show outstanding accounting and market performance. While increasing corporate board size reduced firm risk, its independence increased firm risk. State ownership and ownership concentration increased firm risk after reforms. Overall, the findings confirm the applicability of corporate governance theories to China. Other transition economies can draw lessons from the institutional change that have played a significant role in the evolving Chinese corporate governance system. Government-controlled firms should be more market-oriented so as to reduce the unnecessary influence of political power on firms activities. It also sheds light on the partial privatization approach that may work for other transition economies.

State Ownership and Target Setting: Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies in China*

State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China's mixed ownership reforms

Chinese State-Owned Companies, Misallocation and the Reform Policy

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Are State-Owned Enterprises Equally Reliable Information Suppliers? An Examination of the Impacts of State Ownership on Earnings Management Strategies of Chinese Enterprises

Mixed-Ownership Reform and Private Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence From China

Mixed-ownership reform and strategic choice of Chinese state-owned enterprises

Government Employment Target Pressure and Labor Investment Efficiency in China: A Political Economy Perspective

The Performance of State-Owned Enterprises: New Evidence from the China Employer-Employee Survey

The Political Economy of State Sector Restructuring in China: Cross-Provincial Evidence 2008–2017

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and State Ownership in China: Evidence from New Panel Data*

Mixed-ownership reform of SOEs and ESG performance: Evidence from China

Does Ownership Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Chinese Companies' Response to Targeted Poverty Alleviation

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Does the mixed ownership reform work? Influence of board chair on performance of state-owned enterprises

State-Owned Capital Participation and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Executive Compensation of SOEs and Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence from China

Financial constraints alleviation: Why does state-owned share reduction in China promote firm performance?

Corporate Governance, Firm Performance and Chinese State Enterprise Reform / Zhang Cheng