Abstract:Young children demonstrate awareness of normativity in various domains of social learning. It is unclear, however, whether children recognize that rules can be changed in certain contexts and by certain people or groups. Across three studies, we provided empirical evidence that children consider individual authority and collective agreement when reasoning about who can change rules. In Study 1, children aged 4-7years watched videos of children playing simply sorting and stacking games in groups or alone. Across conditions, the group game was initiated (a) by one child, (b) by collaborative agreement, or (c) by an adult authority figure. In the group games with a rule initiated by one child, children attributed ability to change rules only to that individual and not his or her friends, and they mentioned ownership and authority in their explanations. When the rule was initiated collaboratively, older children said that no individual could change the rule, whereas younger children said that either individual could do so. When an adult initiated the rule, children stated that only the adult could change it. In contrast, children always endorsed a child's decision to change his or her own solitary rule and never endorsed any child's ability to change moral and conventional rules in daily life. Age differences corresponded to beliefs about friendship and agreement in peer play (Study 2) and disappeared when the decision process behind and normative force of collaboratively initiated rules were clarified (Study 3). These results show important connections between normativity and considerations of authority and collaboration during early childhood.

Children's Concepts of Good and Bad Behavior

Preschoolers' Acceptance of Peers with Angry or Sad Disposition

Young Children's Moral Judgments, Justifications, and Emotion Attributions in Peer Relationship Contexts

Children's understanding of habitual behaviour

Upsetting others and provoking ridicule: children's reasoning about the self-presentational consequences of rule violation.

Children's Perceptions of the Behavioral Correlates of Social Acceptance, Rejection, and Neglect in Their Peers

Character disposition and behavior type: influences of valence on preschool children's social judgments

Children's beliefs about the emotional consequences of norm adherence and violation

Is It Bad to Be Good? An Exploration of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Subtypes in Adolescence

Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules

The sources of normativity: Young children's awareness of the normative structure of games.

"Why did she do that?": Chinese children's preference for trait‐based explanations of behavior

Children's sensitivity to the conventionality of sources

Young children's understanding of the context-relativity of normative rules in conventional games

Prosocial choices: How do young children evaluate considerate and inconsiderate behavior?

Parental manipulation of child behavior in home observations1

Young children consider individual authority and collective agreement when deciding who can change rules

Children's moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: Age differences in evaluations of tattling.

Children spontaneously police adults' transgressions

Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan

Toddlers' social evaluations of agents who act on false beliefs