Abstract:When children come to grasp the concept of intention is a central question in theory of mind research. Existing studies, however, present a puzzling picture. On the one hand, infants distinguish between intentional and accidental actions. On the other hand, previous work suggests that until 8 years of age children do not yet understand an essential property of intentions-their aspectuality. Intentions are aspectual in the sense that they refer to objects and actions only under specific aspects. For example, Oedipus married Jocasta without knowing that she was his mother. Thus, he intentionally married Jocasta but did not intentionally marry his mother. However, the negative findings from these studies may indicate performance limitations rather than competence limitations. The rationale of the current set of studies, therefore, was to test children's understanding of the aspectuality of intentions in a simplified, cognitively less demanding design. The participants, 5- and 6-year-olds (Study 1) and 4-year-olds (Study 2), were involved in simple games where they (or another agent) intentionally acted on objects that had an obvious first identity and a hidden second identity. Children either did or did not know about the toy's second identity at the moment of acting. After their actions, children were asked about their intentions regarding the toys' different identities. Results revealed that the 5- and 6-year-olds, but not the 4-year-olds, systematically considered how they (or another agent) represented the objects when making intentionality judgments. Thus, an understanding of aspectual intentions seems to develop at around the late preschool years-much earlier than previously assumed.

The sources of normativity: Young children's awareness of the normative structure of games.

Young children's understanding of the context-relativity of normative rules in conventional games

Young children attribute normativity to novel actions without pedagogy or normative language

Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules

Preschoolers understand the normativity of cooperatively structured competition

Young children consider individual authority and collective agreement when deciding who can change rules

Children's Awareness of Authority to Change Rules in Various Social Contexts

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

References to social norms by preschool children and their linguistic expression

Preverbal infants' understanding of social norms

Children's sensitivity to the conventionality of sources

Children use rules to coordinate in a social dilemma

Children's understanding of habitual behaviour

Young Children and Adults Show Differential Arousal to Moral and Conventional Transgressions

Three-Year-Olds' Reactions to a Partner's Failure to Perform Her Role in a Joint Commitment

Children's understanding of the aspectuality of intentions

Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action

Disagreement, justification, and equitable moral judgments: A brief training study

How preschoolers react to norm violations is associated with culture

The Relationship Between Norm Understanding and Altruistic Punishment among School-Age Children:A Descriptive-to-Injunctive Transition Tendency

Children's beliefs about the emotional consequences of norm adherence and violation