Abstract:Children achieve better long‐term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language more quickly than adults during real‐time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., "gi lion"). Participants categorized these two‐word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., "gi badupi") according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real‐time language exposure. Research Highlights Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input. Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults. Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content. Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real‐time language learning.

Young children's understanding of the context-relativity of normative rules in conventional games

The sources of normativity: Young children's awareness of the normative structure of games.

Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules

Young children consider individual authority and collective agreement when deciding who can change rules

Children's Awareness of Authority to Change Rules in Various Social Contexts

Preschoolers understand the normativity of cooperatively structured competition

Children use rules to coordinate in a social dilemma

Young children attribute normativity to novel actions without pedagogy or normative language

The Perceived Social Context Modulates Rule Learning in Autism

Children's sensitivity to the conventionality of sources

Solving problems: young children exploring the rules of the game

Three-Year-Olds' Reactions to a Partner's Failure to Perform Her Role in a Joint Commitment

Children’s Spontaneous Correction of False Beliefs in a Conversation Partner

References to social norms by preschool children and their linguistic expression

Young Children Use the “ignorance = Getting It Wrong” Rule when Predicting Behavior

Social category formation is induced by cues of sharing knowledge in young children

Developmental Differences in Rule Learning: A Microgenetic Analysis

Linguistic conventionality and the role of epistemic reasoning in children's mutual exclusivity inferences

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Children's understanding of habitual behaviour

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms