Piaget's Marbles: the study of children's games and their knowledge of rules

J. Linaza

Abstract:This paper is a short summary of some research on children's games in Spain and England (Linaza, 1981). It is discussed in relation to Piaget for the wideness of his approach to play and because of his early study on the same topic. In Piaget's theory of play (Piaget, 1966) games are the last manifestation of children's ludic activity. Piaget addressed the study of marbles and other institutional games (Piaget, 1932) long before he carried out his observations on pretend or symbolic play (Piaget, 1946) but in his explanation of the development of play he already proposed a close interaction between intellectual growth and game activity. While dealing with the practical knowledge of the rules he suggested four categories (motor play, egocentric play, beginnings of cooperation and codification of the rules) directly related to the child's cognitive structures (motor schemes, intuitive thinking, concrete and formal operations). He sharply distinguished this knowledge from what he called 'awareness' of the rules, a forerunner of today's 'metacognitive abilities', and proposed three main stages of awareness: the absence of any consciousness about the rules, its conception as immanent in origin and therefore immutable and, finally, consciousness of the rules as the product of mutual agreement among the players involved. Although he suggested the same trend of development for both kinds of knowledge in boys and girls his results showed a surprising lack of the codification stage in girls' games and a premature conception of the rules as the mere agreement among players, almost two years earlier than the boys. The mechanism which brings about all these changes is cooperation. A sharp contrast is made between unilateral respect and mutual respect in the child's interactions with others. It is only the latter, as it exists among children, that allows cooperation to come into existence. The age differences between equivalent stages of knowledge in boys and girls was explained as a consequence of their sex and their preferences for complex (boys) or simple (girls) games. At a general level he upheld a continuity between all three forms of social behaviour (motor, egocentric and cooperative) and the corresponding rules (motor regularities, rules due to unilateral respect, and rules due to mutual respect):

Psychology,Education