Abstract:Young children demonstrate awareness of normativity in various domains of social learning. It is unclear, however, whether children recognize that rules can be changed in certain contexts and by certain people or groups. Across three studies, we provided empirical evidence that children consider individual authority and collective agreement when reasoning about who can change rules. In Study 1, children aged 4-7years watched videos of children playing simply sorting and stacking games in groups or alone. Across conditions, the group game was initiated (a) by one child, (b) by collaborative agreement, or (c) by an adult authority figure. In the group games with a rule initiated by one child, children attributed ability to change rules only to that individual and not his or her friends, and they mentioned ownership and authority in their explanations. When the rule was initiated collaboratively, older children said that no individual could change the rule, whereas younger children said that either individual could do so. When an adult initiated the rule, children stated that only the adult could change it. In contrast, children always endorsed a child's decision to change his or her own solitary rule and never endorsed any child's ability to change moral and conventional rules in daily life. Age differences corresponded to beliefs about friendship and agreement in peer play (Study 2) and disappeared when the decision process behind and normative force of collaboratively initiated rules were clarified (Study 3). These results show important connections between normativity and considerations of authority and collaboration during early childhood.

Children spontaneously police adults' transgressions

Adolescents' Obedience to Parental Authority in Conflict Situations

Children's moral evaluations of reporting the transgressions of peers: Age differences in evaluations of tattling.

Children's Tattling: the reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings.

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

Children’s Restorative Justice in an Intergroup Context

Children as assessors and agents of third-party punishment

Cross-cultural conceptions of third-party intervention across childhood

Children's Awareness of Authority to Change Rules in Various Social Contexts

Multidimensional profiles of Head Start children's social behaviors predict their interpretations of physical aggression

Upstander Intervention and Parenting Styles

To Punish or to Restore: How Children Evaluate Victims' Responses to Immorality

Young people and the formation of attitudes towards the police

Preventing Bullying in Preschool-Age Children: Predictors of Defending Behaviour

Self-control and social control in childhood misconduct and aggression: The role of family structure, hyperactivity, and hostile parenting

Unjustified aggression in preschool

Individual differences in the development of early peer aggression: Integrating contributions of self-regulation, theory of mind, and parenting

Young children consider individual authority and collective agreement when deciding who can change rules

Upsetting others and provoking ridicule: children's reasoning about the self-presentational consequences of rule violation.

Children’s Group Biases In Third-Party Punishment Are Guided By Norms-Focused Behaviors

Young Children and Adults Show Differential Arousal to Moral and Conventional Transgressions