Abstract:For 50 years positive peace has served as an aspirational goal for many scholars and practitioners of peace. However, much recent scholarly literature evidences a substantial ambivalence toward this ambition, suggesting that prominent theories, policies and practices in the field have failed to support positive peace. This article argues that a key reason for this shortcoming is the field’s failure to respond adequately to the evolving character of conflict (latent and overt) related to technological, legal and economic changes associated with the consolidation of globalization over this period. This consolidation has served to shrink the distances between previously remote actors, to expand exponentially the influence of many institutions, norms, practices and projects as they penetrate new societies, to concentrate power into the hands of ever fewer actors, and to reify instead of deconstruct endemic inequality and marginalization within states, between states, and across the globe. The failure of the field to respond robustly to these changes also prompts concerns about its ability to face sweeping challenges soon to come related to technological innovation, climate change, demographic shifts, labour automation and the search for new governance models. This article, therefore, reaffirms the aspirational goals of peace and conflict studies by building on Lederach’s earlier Peacebuilding Triangle to propose a Trans-Scalar Peace System which would recognize the need for coherent and supplementary policies and actions across scales (global, regional, international, nation and local) and utilize a backward-mapping approach to promote a parity of esteem for actors, institutions and decisions at each scale which would, at the same time, privilege the voice of those with the most pertinent knowledge, experience and capacity for action in support of any given policy or practice. Such an approach would honour the lessons of the ‘local turn’ while developing a global trans-scalar peace system.

For the Long-Run: Avoiding the Temptations of the Status Quo, Rancour, and Self-Pity

The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes: insights from attitude theory

The Stalemate of “Solutions” in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: Through the Perspective of Palestinian Intellectuals

Editor’s Remarks

It is Not Too Late for Reconciliation Between Israel and Palestine, Even in the Darkest Hour

Author's response: The challenge of peace

On being paid not to work for the men of impressive but easy affairs

Governments, publics, and enemies: Intragroup dynamics as barriers to conflict resolution

The Middle East Tragedy: Between Utopia and Dystopia

Uses and Abuses of 'Not Wanting Peace' in the Context of the Israel/Palestine Conflict

Ambition and ambivalence: Reconsidering positive peace as a trans-scalar peace system

On Being Rigorous and Relevant: A Tribute to Tom Schelling

Embracing Complexity and the Need for Inclusive Belongings

Belonging and Its Discontents

The international community's role and impact on the Middle East Peace Process

The People's Image of Conflict Resolution

Against the Consensus: Reflections on the Great Recession

The False Readiness Theory: Explaining Failures to Negotiate Israeli-Palestinian Peace

Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems.

Longtermist Education Interventions Increase Concern for and Action to Protect Future Generations

The dark side of moral outrage: Understanding the risks to long-term, meaningful community development work in higher learning