Abstract:Scientific research requires taking risks, as the most cautious approaches are unlikely to lead to the most rapid progress. Yet, much funded scientific research plays it safe and funding agencies bemoan the difficulty of attracting high-risk, high-return research projects. Why don't the incentives for scientific discovery adequately impel researchers toward such projects? Here, we adapt an economic contracting model to explore how the unobservability of risk and effort discourages risky research. The model considers a hidden-action problem, in which the scientific community must reward discoveries in a way that encourages effort and risk-taking while simultaneously protecting researchers' livelihoods against the vicissitudes of scientific chance. Its challenge when doing so is that incentives to motivate effort clash with incentives to motivate risk-taking, because a failed project may be evidence of a risky undertaking but could also be the result of simple sloth. As a result, the incentives needed to encourage effort actively discourage risk-taking. Scientists respond by working on safe projects that generate evidence of effort but that don't move science forward as rapidly as riskier projects would. A social planner who prizes scientific productivity above researchers' well-being could remedy the problem by rewarding major discoveries richly enough to induce high-risk research, but in doing so would expose scientists to a degree of livelihood risk that ultimately leaves them worse off. Because the scientific community is approximately self-governing and constructs its own reward schedule, the incentives that researchers are willing to impose on themselves are inadequate to motivate the scientific risks that would best expedite scientific progress.

On being paid not to work for the men of impressive but easy affairs

Rationalizing risk aversion in science: Why incentives to work hard clash with incentives to take risks

Working Hard or Hardly Working? An Examination of Job Preservation Responses to Job Insecurity

A Case for Pay Secrecy

For the Long-Run: Avoiding the Temptations of the Status Quo, Rancour, and Self-Pity

Realizing the price of academic freedom

Asking for less (but receiving more): Women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives.

Do workers like employer driven flexibility? Experimental evidence on work and pay uncertainty and willingness to work

Unwarranted Overtime: Exploring the Origins and Mitigation Strategies for Excessive Work Hours Among Employees

The Case for the 'No-Collar' Exemption: Eliminating Employer-Imposed Office Hours for Overworked, Remote-Ready Workers

Why High Incentives Cause Repugnance: A Framed Field Experiment

Preparing Working-Class Academics for Success

Do Financial Concerns Make Workers Less Productive?

Normalising exploitation

The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation

The Psychological Role of Pay Systems in Undertaking Discretionary Work Hours

An Underexamined Inequality

Rationalizing risk aversion in science

Post-work society as an oxymoron: Why we cannot, and should not, wish work away

Values and Inequality: Prosocial Jobs and the College Wage Premium

Minimizing Low-value, Uncompensated Work in Academic Infectious Diseases: A Six Step Program