Abstract:The separation of a natural gas mixture containing 85 mol% CH4 and 15 mol% N2 by dual reflux pressure swing adsorption (DR PSA) was investigated using dynamic non-isothermal numerical simulations previously benchmarked against experiments. Two different adsorbents were employed: a commercially available activated carbon (AC1) and the recently developed ionic liquidic zeolite (ILZ), which has about twice the selectivity for methane over nitrogen than the activated carbon. Four DR PSA cycle configurations (PL-A, PH-A, PL-B and PH-B) were studied and iteratively optimized in terms of separation performance and energy consumption. The dynamic non-isothermal simulations, implemented in the software platform Aspen Adsorption, included a polytropic compressor model with temperature dependent heat capacities for more realistic predictions of the compressor duty. The heavy product to feed ratio, the feed step time and the light reflux ratio were selected as key optimization parameters for all four cycles at fixed bed pressure ratio, feed location and feed flow rate. The simulations showed that A-cycles were superior to B-cycles in terms of their separation performance for both adsorbent materials. Overall, the separation performance achieved by AC1 was lower than that by ILZ. At optimized conditions for AC1, PL-A and PH-A cycles achieved approximately 92 mol% CH4 in the heavy product and 4.5 mol% CH4 in the light product with corresponding energy requirement at 9.9 kJ mol−1 (feed) and 8.7 kJ mol−1 (feed), while using the ILZ adsorbent, both PL-A and PH-A cycles were able to deliver 0.9 mol% CH4 in the light product and 93.5 mol% CH4 in the heavy product. The cycle work of the PL-A and PH-A configuration using ILZ was 8.8 and 7.7 kJ mol−1 (feed), respectively. These simulation results show that DR PSA processes using ionic liquidic zeolites can meet strict natural gas separation requirements and that such processes can efficiently upgrade sub-quality natural gas.

Natural gas treating by selective adsorption: Material science and chemical engineering interplay

Multiscale design of a pressure swing adsorption process for natural gas purification

Temperature Swing Adsorption in Natural Gas Processing: A Concise Overview

High‐throughput Computational Screening of Porous Polymer Networks for Natural Gas Sweetening Based on a Neural Network

N2-selective adsorbents and membranes for natural gas purification

Feasibility of Temperature Swing Adsorption in Adsorbent-Coated Microchannels for Natural Gas Purification

Advances in Pressure Swing Adsorption for Gas Separation

Methane separation and capture from nitrogen rich gases by selective adsorption in microporous Materials: A review

Separation of Methane–Nitrogen Mixture by Pressure Swing Adsorption for Natural Gas Upgrading

Highly Porous Materials as Potential Components of Natural Gas Storage Systems: Part 1 (A Review)

Methane/nitrogen separation through pressure swing adsorption process from nitrogen-rich streams

Pressure Swing Adsorption for Biogas Upgrading with Carbon Molecular Sieve

Postextraction Separation, On-Board Storage, and Catalytic Conversion of Methane in Natural Gas: A Review.

Simulation of CO2 capture from natural gas by cyclic pressure swing adsorption process using activated carbon

The removal of CO2 and N2 from natural gas: A review of conventional and emerging process technologies

Nitrogen rejection from natural gas by dual reflux-pressure swing adsorption using activated carbon and ionic liquidic zeolite

Experimental investigation of CO2 separation by adsorption methods in natural gas purification

Adsorption of Natural Gas in Metal-Organic Frameworks: Selectivity, Cyclability, and Comparison to Methane Adsorption

Microporous and mesoporous materials for gas storage and separation: a review

Highly Porous Materials as Potential Components of Natural Gas Storage Systems: Part 2 (A Review)