Abstract:Background Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a measure of colonoscopy quality. Increased colonoscopy performance has been associated with lower interval colorectal cancer rates and mortality from colorectal cancer. However, studies evaluating the impact of endoscopic performance feedback on ADR and other quality markers are lacking. Our study thus aimed to evaluate the effect of the implementation and withdrawal of individual endoscopic scorecards on ADR. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of individuals aged 50 to 75 who underwent complete endoscopies at National University Hospital, Singapore, from March 2014 to December 2019. Pertinent demographic and procedural factors including subjects’ age, gender, bowel cleanliness, and withdrawal time were collected. After one year of baseline data collection, endoscopists were informed of colonoscopy quality tracking through department briefings. After an adjustment period, scorecards were confidentially issued every 6 months, displaying departmental averages and including feedback based on international benchmarks. Wilcoxon test was used for pre-and post-intervention analysis. The study design was approved by the institutional review board. Results We included a total of 9641 screening colonoscopies by 113 endoscopists, whereby the average age of the subjects was 58.9 years old (±10 years). With the intervention of scorecard feedback, we report a significant improvement in both ADR (29.1±2.9% vs 22.8±3.6%, p=0.04) and polyp detection rate (PDR) (42.3±3.3% vs 34.5±3.9%, p=0.03). The introduction of scorecards also resulted in longer withdrawal times (9.6±0.1mins vs 9.0±0.1mins, p<0.01) with an increased proportion of colonoscopies withdrawing beyond 6 minutes (78.8±5.3% vs 70.7±3.1%, p=0.09). Of note, the proportion of endoscopists with an ADR >25% increased from 69.2% to 80.8% after scorecard implementation. The high ADR (30.4±2.9%) and PDR (29.1±2.9%) were maintained even after the withdrawal of the scorecard intervention (IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Figure 1. Comparing adenoma detection rate polyp detection rate and proportion of colonoscopies with withdrawal time beyond 6 minutes pre-and post-intervention with colonoscopy scorecards). Conclusions The use of individual colonoscopy quality scorecards improved ADR. High ADR was maintained even after the withdrawal of scorecard intervention. There is potential for further studies on the automation of real-time feedback on colonoscopy quality to improve ADR.

S949 Does Taking More Endoscopic Images Impact Adenoma Detection? A Quality Improvement Initiative at Our Tertiary Hospital

Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Frequency of endoscopic photodocumentation of large colorectal polyps

Upper endoscopy photodocumentation quality evaluation with novel deep learning system

Impact of endoscopy system, high definition, and virtual chromoendoscopy in daily routine colonoscopy: a randomized trial

The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence

P926 Improved standards of colonoscopy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease through implementation of key performance measures - A quality improvement initiative

S467 A Retrospective Study Examining the Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Adenoma Detection Rate Amongst Non-Gastroenterology Endoscopists in a Rural Medical Center

Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review

The Impact of Computer-aided Detection Technology in Adenoma Detection Rate Among Experienced Endoscopists in the Community Setting

S912 The Link Between Trainee Participation in Colonoscopy Procedures and Quality Metrics

Efficacy of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Colorectal Adenoma Detection: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Quality Metrics in Surgery Resident Performance of Screening Colonoscopy

Overview of a national endoscopy database: The Trans.IT database and its impact on data registration quality

Advanced Endoscopic Imaging Techniques for the Study of Colonic Mucosa in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Medical needs related to the endoscopic technology and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis

IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Impact of Individual Colonoscopy Quality Scorecards on Adenoma Detection Rates

Evaluating the use of Clavien-Dindo classification and Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire as quality indicators in gynecologic endoscopy

Optimal visual gaze pattern of endoscopists for improving adenoma detection during colonoscopy (with video)

A Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Control System Incorporated With Deep Learning Improved Endoscopist Performance in a Pretest and Post-Test Trial

Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.