The Effect of Various Surface Treatments in Cleaning and Preparing Copper, Nickel and Steel for Chromium Plating

William M. Tucker,Robert L. Flint
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3071693
1945-01-01
Transactions of The Electrochemical Society
Abstract:The Hull cell was utilized as a quantitative device in a re‐study of the reluctance of certain cathodes to accept a chromium deposit. Results of excellent reproducibility were obtained. It was concluded that the commercial methods of surface preparation evolved since the inception of chromium plating were adequate if certain limiting factors were duly considered. It was observed that neither copper nor steel were acutely sensitive to methods of surface preparation. A slight preference in covering copper could be given to a pre‐dip in sodium cyanide or to a flash deposit of nickel. Steel could be anodically processed to some advantage in chromic acid, sulfuric acid, or a mixture of the two. Nickel cathodes demonstrated a greater sensitivity and could be very advantageously prepared for plating by immersion in 5.8 N (1:1 by volume) or in 5.8 N (300 g./L ). With the exception of copper, the chief factors involved in the attaining of the widest bright range entailed the complete removal of oxide and other interfering films from the cathode surface, followed by immediate chromium plating, utilizing precautions designed to prevent reforming of such interfering surface films from contact with atmospheric or dissolved oxygen and chromic acid electrolyte.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?