Horizontal QRS Axis Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Zhisheng Chen,Jianmin Chu,Jing Wang,Chi Cai,Xilie Lu,Manshu Song,Lois Balmer,Wei Wang,Xuerui Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.011
IF: 6.779
2024-01-01
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection. Objective To investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns. Methods The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V2 and V6. CRT response was defined as a ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) class reduction one-year post-CRT implantation. The composite endpoint included HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality. Results Among 244 consecutive CRT recipients, 156 (63.9%) responded favorably, while 88 (36.1%) were non-responders. The horizontal QRS axis demonstrated significant backward deviation [-75.5° (-79.7°, -69.0°) vs. -65.0° (-73.0°, -46.5°), P <0.001] and larger magnitude (35.5±10.9 mm vs. 25.5±10.5 mm, P <0.001) in CRT responders compared to non-responders. The direction and magnitude independently predicted CRT response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.717, 0.839) and 0.749 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.814), respectively. Combining both parameters increased the AUC to 0.814 (95% CI: 0.760, 0.868). Moreover, the direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis, or their combination, predicted the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.60), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.67), and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.41), respectively. Conclusion Horizontal QRS axis accurately predicts CRT response and prognosis in HF patients with LBBB.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?