[Role of Electrocardiogram in Predicting Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response].

J P Guo,Y T Wang,Z L Shan,X M Shi,K Lin,H T Yuan,J Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.06.006
2016-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the role of electrocardiogram(ECG)in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.METHODS:This study retrospectively analyzed ECG of 92 CRT patients, who received CRT therapy from 2001 to 2013 in our center and were followed up for 6 months. The patients were divided into responder group (n=64) and non-responder group (n=28). The baseline and 6-month data including QRS width, heart rhythm and axis variation were analyzed. The definition of responder is left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) reduction ≥15% within 6 months after CRT. After CRT therapy, the ventricular activation was changed as left to right (frontal plane), posterior to anterior and axis changed in a clockwise direction. The change in more than two directions was defined as prominent axis change. Logistic analysis was performed to analyze the role of ECG in predicting CRT response.RESULTS:(1) Baseline parameter comparison between the two groups: the proportion of female and LBBB is significantly higher (P<0.01; P=0.04), while the proportion of atrial fibrillation/flutter (Af/AF) is significantly lower (P<0.01) in responder group than in non-responder group. The pre-CRT average QRS duration is much wider in responder group than in non-responder group (P=0.01). (2) Comparison of follow-up with baseline results in two groups: NYHA heart function level, 6 minutes walking distance, QRS duration, LVEF, LVESV improved significantly (P<0.01) post-CRT in responder group. In non-responder group, the QRS duration and LVESV deteriorated significantly (P=0.02, P<0.01), while post-CRT NYHA heart function level improved significantly. In responder group, pre-CRT ECG axis of 53 patients (82.8%) pointed to left and 58 patients (90.6%) pointed to posterior; post-CRT ECG axis of 49 patients (76.6%) pointed to right and 30 patients (40.6%) pointed to anterior. In non-responder group, pre-CRT ECG axis of 25 patients (89.3%) pointed to left and 24 patients (85.7%) pointed to posterior; post-CRT ECG axis of 17 patients (60.7%) pointed to right and 12 patients (42.9%) pointed to anterior. Post-CRT, the proportion of ECG axis prominent change was significantly higher in responder than in non-responder group (62.5%(40/64) vs. 32.1%(9/28), P=0.007). (3)Predicting value: pre-CRT QRS width ≥140 ms (OR=4.97, 95% CI 1.53 to 16.13, P=0.008)and post-CRT prominent axis change (OR=5.1, 95% CI 1.67 to 15.5, P=0.004)were found to be independent predictors of CRT responders. Af/AF pre-CRT was associated with reduced CRT response (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.80, P=0.02).CONCLUSIONS:ECG may play a role in predicting CRT response. QRS width and Af/AF before CRT and ECG axis change post-CRT could be used to predict CRT response.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?