Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Haiyan Lin,Ying Zhou,Geng Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.13-318
2014-01-01
International Heart Journal
Abstract:Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established treatment for a subset of patients with chronic heart failure, a considerable proportion of eligible patients still fail to benefit from this treatment. The aim of this study was to identify potential independent predictors for being a responder to CRT. A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted in 193 consecutive patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex who successfully underwent CRT device implantation from January 2006 to October 2012. Clinical characteristics, left ventricular lead position (LV-Ps), electrocardiography and echocardiography were evaluated before and 12 months after CRT. Response to CRT was defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 5% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with baseline at 12 months after CRT implantation without heart failure rehospitalization or any cause of death. There were 132 responders (68%) and 61 nonresponders (32%). By univariate logistic analysis, the presence of non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) and QRS duration, chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), history of ventricular tachycardia (VT), degree of tricuspid regurgitation and left atrium dimension (LAD) at baseline, ΔQRS duration, and LV-Ps were associated with predicting a response to CRT. However, on multivariate analysis, only optimal LV-Ps and presence of non-LBBB remained independently predictive for a CRT response, with an odds ratio of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-5.66, P = 0.023), 0.15(95% CI: 0.05-0.45, P = 0.001), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with nonoptimal LV-Ps or non-LBBB morphology had a significantly higher rate of mortality or heart failure rehospitalization as compared with those with optimal LV-Ps or LBBB morphology (P < 0.05).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?