An S Wave in ECG Lead V6 Predicts Poor Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Long-Term Outcome.

Zeyu Jiang,Yuanhao Qiu,Zhiyong Qian,Yao Wang,Yongwei Zhao,Xiaofeng Hou,Yanchun Liang,Liangrong Zheng,Geng Xu,Yangang Su,Xiang Gu,Jiangang Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.007

IF: 6.779

2020-01-01

Heart Rhythm

Abstract:BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for selected patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, up to 30%-50% of patients still do not respond to CRT. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to identify the predictive value of an S wave in lead V-6 in CRT response in patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). METHODS The CLBBB definition included the Strauss left bundle branch block criteria and the absence of q waves in leads I, V-5, and V-6. According to the electrocardiogram at baseline, CLBBB patients were divided into 3 groups: T-CLBBB group (CLBBB without an S wave in lead V-5 or V-6), V6S group (CLBBB with an S wave in lead V-5 and no S wave in lead V-6), and V-6&V6S group (CLBBB with S waves in leads V-5 and V-6). CRT response was defined as left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction >= 15% at 6-month follow-up. The combined end point included HF rehospitalization or ad-cause death. RESULTS Of 181 patients with left bundle branch block-like pattern, 112 patients with CLBBB were included into 3 groups: 54 in the T-CLBBB group, 32 in the V5S group, and 26 in the V-6&V6S group. The CRT response rate was 85.2% (46), 65.6% (21), and 38.5% (10), respectively (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that patients in the V(6)7V(6)S group had a higher incidence of HF rehospitalization or all-cause death than those in the other 2 groups (P < .001). In a multivariate logistic regression model analysis, an S wave in lead V-6 was significantly associated with CRT nonresponse (hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.96; P = .042). CONCLUSION An S wave in lead V-6 can predict poor response to CRT and long-term outcome.