Abstract:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapeutic option in symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and evidence of left ventricular (LV) conduction delay (QRS width ≥120 ms), especially when typical left bundle branch block is present. The rationale behind CRT is restoration of aberrant LV electrical activation. As there is considerable heterogeneity of the LV electrical activation pattern among CRT candidates, an individualized approach with targeting of the LV lead in the region of latest electrical activation while avoiding scar tissue may enhance CRT response. Echocardiography, electro anatomic mapping, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement are helpful to guide such targeted LV lead placement. However, an important limitation remains the anatomy of the coronary sinus, which often does not allow concordant LV lead placement in the optimal region. Epicardial LV lead placement through minimal invasive surgery or endocardial LV lead placement through transseptal punction may overcome this limitation, obviously with an increased complication risk. Furthermore, recent pacing algorithms suggest superiority of LV-only versus biventricular pacing in patients with preserved atrio ventricular (AV) conduction and a typical LBBB pattern. Finally, pacing from only one LV site might not overcome the wide electrical dispersion often seen in patients with LV conduction delays. Therefore, multisite pacing has gained significant interest to improve CRT response. The use of multiple LV leads may potentially lead to more favorable reverse remodeling, improved functional capacity and quality of life in CRT candidates, but adverse events and a shorter battery span are more frequent because of the extra lead. The use of one multipolar LV lead increases the number of pacing configurations within the same coronary sinus side branch (within small distances from each other) without the use of an additional lead. Small observational studies suggest that more effective resynchronization can be achieved with this approach. Finally, there are many reasons for non effective CRT delivery in carefully selected patients with an adequately implanted device. Multidisciplinary, post implantation care inside a dedicated CRT clinic ensures optimal CRT delivery, improves response rate and should be considered standard of care.

Left ventricular electrical delay predicts volumetric response to leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

The left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Location, Location, Location: A Pilot Study to Compare Electrical with Echocardiographic-Guided Targeting of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

The QR-max index, a novel electrocardiographic index for the determination of left ventricular conduction delay and selection of cardiac resynchronization in patients with non-left bundle branch block

The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

Area of Left Ventricular Regional Conduction Delay and Preserved Myocardium Predict Responses to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: site of latest left ventricular activation relative to pacing site

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

A novel method combining gated SPECT and vectorcardiography to guide left ventricular lead placement to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A proof of concept study

Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: May We Predict the Long-Term Clinical Response?

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Impact of QRS complex duration and morphology on left ventricular reverse remodelling and left ventricular function improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy

LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD PLACEMENT TARGETED AT THE LATEST ACTIVATED SITE GUIDED BY ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MAPPING IN CORONARY SINUS BRANCHES IMPROVES RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY