Abstract:Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the acute hemodynamic and ECG effects of LBBAP, BVP, and left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT) in CRT candidates with advanced conduction disease.METHODS:In this multicenter study, 48 patients with either nonspecific interventricular conduction delay (n=29) or left bundle branch block (n=19) underwent acute hemodynamic testing to determine the change in left ventricular pressure maximal first derivative (LV dP/dtmax) from baseline atrial pacing to BVP, LBBAP, or LOT-CRT.RESULTS:Atrioventricular-optimized increases in LV dP/dtmaxfor LOT-CRT (mean, 25.8% [95% CI, 20.9%–30.7%]) and BVP (26.4% [95% CI, 20.2%–32.6%]) were greater than unipolar LBBAP (19.3% [95% CI, 15.0%–23.7%]) or bipolar LBBAP (16.4% [95% CI, 12.7%–20.0%];P≤0.005). QRS shortening was greater in LOT-CRT (29.5 [95% CI, 23.4–35.6] ms) than unipolar LBBAP (11.9 [95% CI, 6.1–17.7] ms), bipolar LBBAP (11.7 ms [95% CI, 6.4–17.0]), or BVP (18.5 [95% CI, 11.0–25.9] ms), allP≤0.005. Compared with patients with left bundle branch block, patients with interventricular conduction delay experienced less QRS reduction (P=0.026) but similar improvements in LV dP/dtmax(P=0.29). Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less LV dP/dtmaximprovement than unipolar LBBAP (18.6% versus 23.7%;P<0.001). Subclassification of LBBAP capture (EHRA criteria) indicated LBBAP or LV septal pacing in 27 patients (56%) and deep septal pacing in 21 patients (44%). The hemodynamic benefit of adding left ventricular coronary vein pacing to LBBAP depended on baseline QRS duration (P=0.031) and success of LBBAP (P<0.004): LOT-CRT provided 14.5% (5.0%–24.1%) greater LV dP/dtmaximprovement and 20.8 (12.8–28.8) ms greater QRS shortening than LBBAP in subjects with QRS ≥171 ms and deep septal pacing capture type.CONCLUSIONS:In a CRT cohort with advanced conduction disease, LOT-CRT and BVP provided greater acute hemodynamic benefit than LBBAP. Subjects with wider QRS or deep septal pacing are more likely to benefit from the addition of a left ventricular coronary vein lead to implement LOT-CRT.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04905290.

The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

Left ventricular electrical delay predicts volumetric response to leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Electrical Resynchronization and Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Follow-Up in Intraventricular Conduction Delay Patients Applied Left Bundle Branch Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients: Select Site - Cohort Study

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Personalized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Real-time Electrocardiographic Imaging for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block patients

LV cathode position in CRT recipients: How can we benefit from CMR?

Comparison of Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Prioritizing Ventricular Resynchronization Versus Left Ventricular Filling During Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Outcomes of Upgrading to LBBP in CRT Nonresponders: A Prospective, Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Case-Control Study