Abstract:Background The existing ECG criteria for diagnosing left bundle branch block (LBBB) are insufficient to distinguish between true and false blocks accurately. Methods We hypothesized that the notch width of the QRS complex in the lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6) on the LBBB-like ECG could further confirm the diagnosis of true complete left bundle branch block (t-LBBB). We conducted high-density, three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping in the cardiac chambers of 37 patients scheduled to undergo CRT. These patients' preoperative electrocardiograms met the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for the diagnosis of complete LBBB. If the left bundle branch potential could be mapped from the base of the heart to the apex on the left ventricular septum, it was defined as a false complete left bundle branch block (f-LBBB). Otherwise, it was categorized as a t-LBBB. We conducted a comparative analysis between the two groups, considering the clinical characteristics, real-time correspondence between the spread of ventricular electrical excitation and the QRS wave, QRS notch width of the lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6), and the notch width/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (Nw/LVd) ratio. We performed the ROC correlation analysis of Nw/LVd and t-LBBB to determine the sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic authenticity. Results Twenty-five patients were included in the t-LBBB group, while 12 patients were assigned to the f-LBBB group. Within the t-LBBB group, the first peak of the QRS notch correlated with the depolarization of the right ventricle and septum, the trough corresponded to the depolarization of the left ventricle across the left ventricle, and the second peak aligned with the depolarization of the left ventricular free wall. In contrast, within the f-LBBB group, the first peak coincided with the depolarization of the right ventricle and a majority of the left ventricle, the second peak occurred due to the depolarization of the latest, locally-activated myocardium in the left ventricle, and the trough was a result of delayed activation of the left ventricle that did not align with the usual peak timing. The QRS notch width (45.2 ± 12.3 ms vs. 52.5 ± 9.2 ms, P < 0.05) and the Nw/LVd ratio (0.65 ± 0.19 ms/mm vs. 0.81 ± 0.17 ms/mm, P < 0.05) were compared between the two groups. After conducting the ROC correlation analysis, a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 91.7% for diagnosing t-LBBB using Nw/LVd were obtained. Conclusion By utilizing the current diagnostic criteria for LBBB, an increased Nw/LVd value can enhance the effectiveness of diagnosing LBBB.

True Complete Left Bundle Branch Block Morphology Strongly Predicts Good Response To Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Impact of bundle branch block morphology on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

An S Wave in ECG Lead V6 Predicts Poor Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Long-Term Outcome.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure based on Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block

Left Bundle Branch Block-associated Cardiomyopathy: A New Approach

Personalized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Real-time Electrocardiographic Imaging for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block patients

Effect of R-V1 Amplitude on CRT Reactivity in Patients with Complete Left Bundle Branch Block: a Retrospective Study of 108 Cases

Area of Left Ventricular Regional Conduction Delay and Preserved Myocardium Predict Responses to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Horizontal QRS Axis Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Redefining left bundle branch block from high-density electroanatomical mapping

Effects of Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Left-Bundle-Branch Area Pacing and Coronary Sinus Pacing

Resynchronization Effects and Clinical Outcomes During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with and Without Conduction System Capture.

Changes of Repolarization Parameters after Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and the Association with Echocardiographic Response in Heart Failure Patients

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients by Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

The left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.