Abstract:Faced with the emergence of strategic partnerships (SP), international actors have approached this new phenomenon in the international system through different logics of action. Such logics are tightly associated with the purposes that the SPs are intended to fulfill for the initiating actor. They also tend to reflect the worldview of the initiators as well as their perceptions of the major organizing principles of the international system. In this article, we investigate three different logics: the conventional, the relational, and the functional. These three logics correspond to the strategies of strategic partnering of the United States (US), China, and the European Union (EU) and reflect both the dominant foreign policy orientation of these actors and their self-perceptions as major poles of power in the world. We analyze the construction of these logics by focusing on the relative importance that each of them accords to interests and values when setting up SPs around the world. We contend that an important conceptual gap exists between the major initiators of strategic partnerships, the US and China, which are both to a large extent driven by a self-perception as Great Powers, although the logics with which they seek to fulfill this role diverge substantially. The EU pursues SPs according to a functional logic which in itself also diverge in significant aspects to both the US and China. Taken together, the interests which dictate the necessity of strategic partnerships and the values which condition their feasibility form four distinct patterns of partnering: the homogenous, marriage-of-convenience, come-in-handy, and heterogeneous SPs. These ideal forms of SPs have distinct but contrasting implications for the structure of the international system.

On the Two Kinds of Balanced Logics in Structural Realism

International Structure and State Behavior: “Dueling Realisms”

American Realists' Offshore Balancing Strategy and Its Analytical Relevance to Sino-Japan Relations

Dilemma of Balancing: Balance of Powe r and World Politics in the 21~(st) Century

Classical Geopolitics, Realism and the Balance of Power Theory

Actorsin "Multi-States System":Different Behavioral Logics and Foundations

On Western Realists' Theory of International Security

The Strategic Position of Rimland Powers:Theoretical Logic and Policy Options

Contending logics of strategic partnership in international politics

The Logic in Constructivism and China's Harmonious Global Diplomacy

The Development and Extension of Structural Realist Foreign Policy Theory and Considerations for Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy

Ranke VS.Dehio:Balance of Power Realism and Hegemonic Realism

On the Meaning of Balance of Powers

Hegemony,Balance of Power and Grand Strategy:Off-Shore Balancing and Selective Engagement

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

An Analysis on the Powers' Factors in the Process of International Economic System Establishment and Running

Structural Liberalism's Idea of Order in the West

Domains and Limitations of Structural Analysis

Symbiotic Realism: Way Forward for Great Power Relations

Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order