Abstract:International relations theories,in both the West and in China,have shown the tendency of reaching a final stage and becoming vulgar.The author argues that it is now time to trace back their sources and to reflect on their subjectivity.By answering three basic questions:“do states have boundaries?,” “does the international have relations?,” and “do international relations have theories?,” the author reflects on the dimensions of IR theories,i.e.,the theorization of international relations,and analyzes the congenital weaknesses and ultimate inclination of international relations theories.The author also argues that international relations are human relations and social relations presented at the international level.Like other social sciences,international relations theory is human knowledge,i.e.,a kind of study about humans.The abstraction of the nation should not come at the cost of losing human subjectivity.Chinese diplomacy expounds upon the theorization of international relations in practice.Such practice will neither promote the Sinification of Western international relations theories nor create a Chinese international relations theory or a so-called Chinese school.Rather,when the Western myth is destroyed by the rise of Asia through the co-rise of China and India,the history and cultural content of international relations theories finally will be restored.

Domains and Limitations of Structural Analysis

A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism

Intra-realist Debates and Its Orientations

Development of IR Theoretical Studies in the United States:On the Basis of Articles in International Organization and International Studies Quarterly

The Development and Extension of Structural Realist Foreign Policy Theory and Considerations for Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy

From Paradigms to Research Programs: The Structure of IR Theory

On the Internal and External Debates of Positivist IR Research

Understanding Change in Continuity: Response to the Critique that Realism Cannot Explain Change

International Structure and State Behavior: “Dueling Realisms”

On the Two Kinds of Balanced Logics in Structural Realism

On Western Realists' Theory of International Security

Will Structural Realism Solve the Problems for Scientific Realism?

Language and International Relations: A New Framework for Political Analysis

The Constructive Version of Structural Realism and Reductionism

Dilemmas of Offensive Realism

Critical Realism and Complexity Theory: Building a Nonconstructivist Systems Research Framework for Effective Governance Analysis

Structural Correspondence Between Organizational Theories

Theorization of International Relations Theory

Progress of IR Studies in China: A Critique and Reflection

Realist Constructivism from the Viewpoint of Bridging Theories

Problems in and Reflections on Studies of International Relations in China