Abstract:The development of International Relations theory (IRT) in China has been framed by three debates since 1979. The first was about China's opening up to the outside world. It started with the question of whether the world was characterized by ‘war and revolution’ or ‘peace and development’ between orthodox and reformist scholars and continued to focus on China's interest between orthodox scholars and the newly rising Chinese realists. It resulted in a wide acceptance of the reformist argument that peace and development characterized our era and of the realist view that China was a normal nation-state and should have its own legitimate national interest. The second started in the early 1990s and centered on the better way of realizing China's national interest. It was between Chinese realists and liberals. While the former emphasized national power, the latter proposed the alternative approach of international institutions. The third debate was on China's peaceful rise. It evolved at the turn of the century, when all the three major American IRTs, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, had been introduced into China and therefore the debate was more a tripartite contention. Realists believed that it was impossible for any major power to rise peacefully, while liberals and constructivists both supported the peaceful-rise argument. Liberals stressed more the tangible benefits derived from international institutions and constructivists explored more China's identity in its increasing interaction with international society. Although it was Chinese constructivists who explicitly discussed the identity issue, all the three debates and all the debating sides have reflected this century puzzle since the Opium War – China's identity vis-à-vis international society. These debates have helped push forward the IRT development in China and at the same time established Western IRT as the dominant discourse. A new round of debate seems likely to occur and may center on the question of the world order. This time it may help the newly burgeoning but highly dynamic Chinese IRT to develop and contribute to the enrichment of IRT as knowledge of human life.

On the Internal and External Debates of Positivist IR Research

Debates on Pragmatics in the Western Academic Circle of IR

Approaches and Paradigms in International Relations Studies

From Paradigms to Research Programs: The Structure of IR Theory

Intra-realist Debates and Its Orientations

The Discussions of Positivism and Interpretivism

Positivist Research Method on Economic Law and Its Application

Development of IR Theoretical Studies in the United States:On the Basis of Articles in International Organization and International Studies Quarterly

On the Methodology of the Positive Political Theory

Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates

Imbalanced use of methodologies:a discussion on the method of objectivism

A Comparative Analysis on Positivism and Critical Realism in Accounting Research

Domains and Limitations of Structural Analysis

Theories and Explanations in IR Studies

The Logic Drawbacks of Logical Positivism Applied to Economics

The Contribution and Limits of the Positivist Method of Humanities in the Qianjia Scholarship

International Organization and the Study of World Politics

Interpretivism vs. Positivism in Political Marketing Research

Positivistic, Hermeneutical and Critical:Three Traditions of Psychological Research

On the New Aspects and Perspective of IR Studies in the West

Constructivism Studies in China’s IR Community: Strengths and Weaknesses (1998～2004)