Abstract:The development of International Relations theory (IRT) in China has been framed by three debates since 1979. The first was about China's opening up to the outside world. It started with the question of whether the world was characterized by ‘war and revolution’ or ‘peace and development’ between orthodox and reformist scholars and continued to focus on China's interest between orthodox scholars and the newly rising Chinese realists. It resulted in a wide acceptance of the reformist argument that peace and development characterized our era and of the realist view that China was a normal nation-state and should have its own legitimate national interest. The second started in the early 1990s and centered on the better way of realizing China's national interest. It was between Chinese realists and liberals. While the former emphasized national power, the latter proposed the alternative approach of international institutions. The third debate was on China's peaceful rise. It evolved at the turn of the century, when all the three major American IRTs, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, had been introduced into China and therefore the debate was more a tripartite contention. Realists believed that it was impossible for any major power to rise peacefully, while liberals and constructivists both supported the peaceful-rise argument. Liberals stressed more the tangible benefits derived from international institutions and constructivists explored more China's identity in its increasing interaction with international society. Although it was Chinese constructivists who explicitly discussed the identity issue, all the three debates and all the debating sides have reflected this century puzzle since the Opium War – China's identity vis-à-vis international society. These debates have helped push forward the IRT development in China and at the same time established Western IRT as the dominant discourse. A new round of debate seems likely to occur and may center on the question of the world order. This time it may help the newly burgeoning but highly dynamic Chinese IRT to develop and contribute to the enrichment of IRT as knowledge of human life.

Debates on Pragmatics in the Western Academic Circle of IR

On the Internal and External Debates of Positivist IR Research

Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology

Pragma-Dialectics: from a Perspective of Critical Thinking

Intra-realist Debates and Its Orientations

Arguing, Bargaining and all that: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations

Language and International Relations: A New Framework for Political Analysis

Approaches and Paradigms in International Relations Studies

The pragmatic turn in law: Inference and interpretation in legal discourse

Logical Given, Interactive Negotiation and Self-Denial of Self-Consciousness-Hegelian Pragmatism in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy and Its Critique

Integrating Discourse, Construction and Objectivity: A Contemporary Realist Approach

Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates

From Paradigms to Research Programs: The Structure of IR Theory

Introducing internet pragmatics

The State of the Art in Pragma-Dialectic Theory

"The Four Great Syntheses" and IR Theory Synthesizing Trend

Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues

Debate on Definite Description: Viewpoints,Divergences and Direction

Pragmatics learning and teaching in L2 Chinese

Understand Meanings: Theory, Discourse and International Relations

The study of Chinese scholars in foreign policy analysis: an emerging research program