Abstract:Among the philosophical origins of John Rawls'A Theory of Justice,one figure has always been ignored-W.T.Stace,the doctoral supervisor of Rawls at Princeton.As an expert in mysticism,Hegelian philosophy and moral psychology,Stace is decisive in the formation of Rawls' philosophy.Richard Marius attributed Rawls'loss of faith partly to his intellectual engagement with Stace's essay Man Against Darkness.As Hegel was unwelcomed in western academic world at that time,Rawls'intentional concealing of his relationship with Stace is a manifestation of his attitude towards Hegel.Religion is perceived positively in Dewey's work and plays a pivotal role constructing democratic communities.In contrast,Rawls discards religious elements such as loyalty,universal fraternity and tolerance in designing the principles of justice,his ideal society is based on a wholly new foundation.Dewey advocates a gradually progressive way of reform,following the intellectual line of Locke-Hume-Smith.Education is employed as a main means.Whereas Rawls proposes a radically fundamental social transformation,following the line of Hobbes-Rousseau-Kant-Marx,These two ways may provide some far-reaching insight for China in its social and political reform at a critical turning point.In the process of Chinese social and political reform in the new century,it is of much significance to learn from these two scholars mentioned above while adhering to Marxism.Dewey's gradual approach to social reform might be of a great help in the social construction at grassroots level,whereas John Rawls'theory of justice is valuable in Chinese political reform.Finally,a well-ordered society with democracy,freedom,fairness and justice is what Chinese people really needs today.The major inspiration which can be drawn form these two political philosophers is : political and social reform should accord with the aspiration of people and human nature.

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

The Complex of Theory of Rawls' Education Equity and the Criticism of Its Principle of Methodology

Issues Concerning Rawls

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

Overlapping Consensus, Right and Good in a Plural Society:A Review on Rawls' Core Ideas in His Late Political Philosophy

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Idealism in the Western Political-Ethical Philosophy

Reasonableness and Political Legitimacy——A Study of John Rawls's Liberal Principle of Legitimacy

Can the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism and Its Explanation Successfully lead to Political Neutrality?

On the Issue of "Social Union" of the Late Years of Rawls and His Social View

The Moral Basis of Liberal Justice Theory

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

Fragmentary or Comprehensive:Comparative Study of Dewey's and Rawls' Social Governance Theories

Rethinking Liberty:On Sen's impossibility of a Paretian libertarian theorem

In Search of Legal Base for Global Justice:Disputes on International Meaning of Rawls' Theory of Justice

Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear

The Public Nature of Rights and World Justice: A Comparative Study of Cosmopolitanism and The Law of Peoples

Meaning and context in political theory

Rawls Vs. Nozick Vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice

How to Justify Principles of Justice

Knowledge Justice and Rawls's Theory of Justice