Abstract:Among the philosophical origins of John Rawls'A Theory of Justice,one figure has always been ignored-W.T.Stace,the doctoral supervisor of Rawls at Princeton.As an expert in mysticism,Hegelian philosophy and moral psychology,Stace is decisive in the formation of Rawls' philosophy.Richard Marius attributed Rawls'loss of faith partly to his intellectual engagement with Stace's essay Man Against Darkness.As Hegel was unwelcomed in western academic world at that time,Rawls'intentional concealing of his relationship with Stace is a manifestation of his attitude towards Hegel.Religion is perceived positively in Dewey's work and plays a pivotal role constructing democratic communities.In contrast,Rawls discards religious elements such as loyalty,universal fraternity and tolerance in designing the principles of justice,his ideal society is based on a wholly new foundation.Dewey advocates a gradually progressive way of reform,following the intellectual line of Locke-Hume-Smith.Education is employed as a main means.Whereas Rawls proposes a radically fundamental social transformation,following the line of Hobbes-Rousseau-Kant-Marx,These two ways may provide some far-reaching insight for China in its social and political reform at a critical turning point.In the process of Chinese social and political reform in the new century,it is of much significance to learn from these two scholars mentioned above while adhering to Marxism.Dewey's gradual approach to social reform might be of a great help in the social construction at grassroots level,whereas John Rawls'theory of justice is valuable in Chinese political reform.Finally,a well-ordered society with democracy,freedom,fairness and justice is what Chinese people really needs today.The major inspiration which can be drawn form these two political philosophers is : political and social reform should accord with the aspiration of people and human nature.

On the Issue of "Social Union" of the Late Years of Rawls and His Social View

The Complex of Theory of Rawls' Education Equity and the Criticism of Its Principle of Methodology

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Issues Concerning Rawls

Evolution of the Concept of “Personal”and the Spirit of the Age——From“the Abstract Person”to“Realistic Individual”and “Civil Society”

Fragmentary or Comprehensive:Comparative Study of Dewey's and Rawls' Social Governance Theories

The Ethics of Self-respect and Mutual Respect: From the Mutual Disinterest of Rawls

From Principle to Context: Marx versus Nozick and Rawls on Distributive Justice

Overlapping Consensus, Right and Good in a Plural Society:A Review on Rawls' Core Ideas in His Late Political Philosophy

In Search of Legal Base for Global Justice:Disputes on International Meaning of Rawls' Theory of Justice

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Justice, Loyalty and Solidarity: On the Social Criticism Theories of Rorty and Walzer

The Theory of Social Justice in Western Contemporary Political Philosophy

Deng Zhenglai's Research onHayek's Social Theory and Its Possible Limits:Based on Ralws's "Conception of Liberal Community"

The Rawlsian Critique of Utilitarianism: A Luhmannian Interpretation

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

On the Tension Between Constitutionalism and Democracy——From the U.S.Constitutional Debate to Rawls's Theoretical Response

A Rational Representation of Social Justice from a Dual Perspective

Constructing the Normative Basis of Immorality of Exploitation and Criticizing the Contemporary Liberal Theory of Justice——Two Basic Paths for Marxists to Turn to Political Philosophy

Citizen Social Right in China:Retrospection,Reality and Suggestion for Policy-making

Social Justice or Individual Freedom:An Inquiry into the Ultimate Pursuit of Pound's Interest Theory