Abstract:From a social psychology perspective, this study explored the personal and social psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice. This study constructed a four-dimensional model of the psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice from the two dimensions of "Self vs. Society" and "Identity vs. Resource." They were Identity-Based Self-Oriented Motivation (Pacifying Outrage), Resource-Based Self-Oriented Motivation (Occupying Resource), Identity-Based Society-Oriented Motivation (Value Confirmation), and Resource-Based Society-Oriented Motivation (Deterrence and Control). In this study, 497 sets of valid data were extracted from 6 universities in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China, using 3 sets of situational experiments and the "Questionnaire Star" online survey platform as a vehicle to explore the personal motivations and psychosocial motivations of Retaliatory Justice. The empirical results showed that the situational experiment significantly verified the existence of Pacifying Outrage and Value Confirmation, and partially verified the existence of Deterrence and Control and Occupying Resource. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that only the effect of Pacifying Outrage on Retaliatory Justice showed a main effect, and the interaction between Pacifying Outrage and Deterrence and Control was not significant. Pacifying Outrage significantly affects Retaliatory Justice, while Occupying Resource significantly affects Retaliatory Justice, but the interaction between the two was not significant. Value Confirmation significantly affects Retaliatory Justice. Value Confirmation and Deterrence and Control synergistically affect Retaliatory Justice, but Deterrence and Control had no significant effect on Retaliatory Justice. Taking emotions as clues, this paper discussed the realistic value of the rheological paths of the psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice, which brought enlightenment to the improvement of social morality, the cultivation of judicial trust, and the construction of psychological service system.

Justice, Loyalty and Solidarity: On the Social Criticism Theories of Rorty and Walzer

The Complex of Theory of Rawls' Education Equity and the Criticism of Its Principle of Methodology

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Fragmentary or Comprehensive:Comparative Study of Dewey's and Rawls' Social Governance Theories

On the Issue of "Social Union" of the Late Years of Rawls and His Social View

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

The Theory of Social Justice in Western Contemporary Political Philosophy

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

The Ethics of Self-respect and Mutual Respect: From the Mutual Disinterest of Rawls

THE GAP BETWEEN RORTY'S “IRONISM” AND “SOLIDARITY”—A REASSESSMENT FROM A WITTGENSTEINIAN PERSPECTIVE1

The Moral Basis of Liberal Justice Theory

The dialectics of universality: The heterodox critical social theory of Robert Fine

Issues Concerning Rawls

The Public Nature of Rights and World Justice: A Comparative Study of Cosmopolitanism and The Law of Peoples

From Principle to Context: Marx versus Nozick and Rawls on Distributive Justice

In Search of Legal Base for Global Justice:Disputes on International Meaning of Rawls' Theory of Justice

Between order and insurgency: Post-structuralism and the problem of justice

Justice as a Social Bargain and Optimization Problem

Analysis of personal psychological motivation and social psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice under moral public opinion: Chinese cases

Constructing the Normative Basis of Immorality of Exploitation and Criticizing the Contemporary Liberal Theory of Justice——Two Basic Paths for Marxists to Turn to Political Philosophy

What is a Rechtsgüeter:A Response from Legal Sociology and Law and Economics