Hegemony,Balance of Power and Grand Strategy:Off-Shore Balancing and Selective Engagement

Wu Zhengyu

2009-01-01

Abstract:In the studies of modern international relations,balance-of-power theory and theory of hegemony have been developed along two parallel but never overlapped lines,and this can be exclusively attributed to the different nature and basis of hegemony defined by the two theories. In modern history,liberal hegemons generally employed two kinds of means to maintain its leading positions:one is international institutions,and the other is the preponderance of power. Being the leading maritime powers,the liberal hegemons have always regarded maintaining the balance of power among major powers in European(Eurasia) continent as one of the most important ways to uphold its positions. As a result,they often faced a hard choice between two modes of grand strategy,namely,off-shore balancing and selective engagement. Because the theoretical basis and historical conditions which off-shore balancing depends on is no longer applicable to the post war era,the U. S. has adopted selective engagement as its grand strategy towards Eurasia,which not only led to the leading position of the U.S. but also accounted for the continuity of the U. S. grand strategy in the post-war period.