Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

The Political Fragility of the Current Regime in China: Interview with Susan Shirk

The Political Fragility of the Current Regime in China. Interview with Susan Shirk by Robert Boyer and Sébastien Lechevalier

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

Peaceful Rise. Oxford University Press, 2007. 336p. $27.00 hard cover.

Can Chinaâ€™s Political SystemÂ Sustain Its Peaceful Rise?

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order

Domestic Politics, China’s Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order

Chinese Foreign Relations Grand Strategies: From Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping

[BOOK REVIEW] The political logic of economic reform in China

[BOOK REVIEW] How China opened its door, the political success of the PRC's foreign trade and investment reforms

China in a World of Orders: Rethinking Compliance and Challenge in Beijing's International Relations

The Current International Situation and the Adjustment of Chinese Diplomacy

Understanding China: A Dialogue with Philip Huang

From 'Japan Problem' to 'China Threat'?

What Can History Reveal about the Future of Sino-American Relations?-Retrospect, Reflections, and Prospects

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

Changing Media, Changing Foreign Policy in China

Theory and Practice in China’s Approaches to Multilateralism and Critical Reflections on the Western ‘Rules-Based International Order’

Shifting journalistic paradigms of American correspondents on contemporary China: The case of Orville Schell

The future of US-China relations: a scientific investigation

The Motivation Behind China’s Public Diplomacy