Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

Shifting journalistic paradigms of American correspondents on contemporary China: The case of Orville Schell

Embedded journalism: constructing romanticized images of China by US journalists in the 1970s

Changing media, changing China

Recontextualizing Constructive Journalism in Contemporary China: A Comparative and Intercultural Perspective

Changing Media, Changing Foreign Policy in China

The Political Fragility of the Current Regime in China: Interview with Susan Shirk

Contemporary International Media Environment and China's Image Communication

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

“Tell China's story well”

Crossing over the Boundaries between Political Criticism and Academic Studies:An Interview with Noam Chomsky

National Prisms of a Global Phenomenon: A Comparative Study of Press Coverage of Climate Change in the US, UK and China

«To Tell about China»

The News and Local Production of the Global

U.S.Congress,Presidency,and China Policy:Changes,Debates and Agendas

A Chinese academic tradition examined in the context of international academic communication: exploratory research into Shang Que articles

With the Faltering Liberal Journalism Model; Is China Set to Lead Emmerging Powers in Shaping New Global Journalism?

China Studies:Its International Perspectives and Indigenous Significances

Americans in China

Investigative journalism, environmental problems and modernization in China, by Jingrong Tong

On location: reflections on fieldwork in Chinese journalism studies

China's New Foreign Policy: Not Conflict but Convergence of Interests