Abstract:Abstract Background and Aims: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing strategy that improves ventricular synchrony by utilizing the native conduction system. However, the current standard practices limit continuous monitoring of paced electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac electrogram (EGM) transition, which may result in overlooked or misinterpreted subtle transitions. This study aimed to explore the electrophysiological characteristics of the lead-position-dependent EGM continuous transition and evaluate their clinical significance. Methods: This observational study included patients referred for LBBP due to symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. A continuous pacing and recording technique was employed, allowing real-time monitoring of progressive alterations in the paced QRS complex as the lead penetrates deeper into the ventricular septum. EGM and ECG parameters were continuously monitored and analyzed. Results: The study encompassed 105 patients, with selective LBBP achieved in 88 patients (83.8%). The amplitude of ventricular EGM predictably changed with radial interventricular septum depth and peaked in the mid-septum. As the lead was inserted into the left ventricular subendocardium, the ventricular current of injury (COI) declined to a level approximating that of the right septum. Continuous recording technique enabled real-time monitoring of the entire perforation process and the subtle variations that exist among different perforation modalities. The discernment of discrete was feasible through the examination of unfiltered EGM, suggesting that selective LBB capture can also be confirmed by observing the subtle morphological transitions within the ventricular COI. Conclusions: The continuous recording technique provides a more detailed understanding of the radial depth of the pacing lead throughout the implantation process. It simplifies the implantation procedures and facilitates the prevention or early detection of perforations. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications.

Clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with lead perforation

Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Lead Perforation: A Single‐center Experience

Percutaneous Management of Atrium and Lung Perforation: A Case Report

Atrial lead perforation early after device implantation—a case report and literature review

Hybrid technique in management of late lead right ventricular perforation

Complications of Cardiac Perforation and Lead Dislodgement with an MRI-Conditional Pacing Lead: a Korean Multi-Center Experience

Abstract 13622: Current of Injury is an Indicator of Lead Depth and Acute Perforation During Left Bundle Branch Pacing Lead Implantation

Predictors of the right ventricular perforation caused by active‐fixation pacing and defibrillator leads: A single‐centre experience

Occurrence of Ventricular Septal Perforation in Patients with Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing Followed Up Using Echocardiographic and Computed Tomography Images

Current of injury is an indicator of lead depth and performance during left bundle branch pacing lead implantation

The clinic application of retained guidewire in left ventricular lead-12 cases

Effects of Retained Guidewire on Pacing Lead

Electrophysiological characteristics of lead-position-dependent EGM uninterrupted transition during left bundle branch pacing

Systematic Review of Leadless Pacemaker

Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Due to Perforation by Permanent Pacemaker Lead

Value of enhanced MSCT in the diagnosis of gallbladder perforation

Pacemaker-Lead Dislodgement and Cardiac Perforation

Risk factors for severe complications of transvenous lead extraction

Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Perforation and Disruption 33 Cases Report

Risk Factors of Coronary Perforation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Management of Coronary Artery Perforation During Pecutaneous Coronary Intervention