Abstract:Placement of ICDs, permanent pacemakers and biventricular devices is performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Implantable device leads can cause Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) when they interfere with leaflet motion. In our clinical experience, we had two cases where patients with endocardial right ventricle leads developed severe TR. One patient was treated by having his leads repositioned and the other required surgery. This study analyzed the grade of tricuspid regurgitation before and after implantation of lead pacmencker in Right Ventrecle. Aim: Evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation after right ventricular permanent lead implantation to check if echocardiographic guidance is needed for adequate lead positioning. Methods: 76 patients had trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiographic studies before and after implantation of permanent right ventricular leads. Results: Before Right Ventricular (RV) lead implantation, 96% of patients had Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR). Patients were stratified by grade of regurgitation. 57 patients were grade 1 (75%), 12 (16%) were grade 2 and 4 were grade 3 or 4 (5%). After RV lead implantation, 44 patients with grade 1 TR remained with the same degree (77%) while in 2 (3.5%) TR progressed to grade 2 and in the remainder the TR disappeared. Most of the patients with grade 2 TR before RV lead implantation (75%) remained in grade 2 while 25% the grade decreased to grade 1. In all the patients with grade 3 and 4 TR pre-implantation, the severity of TR decreased by one grade. In 56 patients with non-CRT device implantations, 39 (70%) had grade 1 TR before procedure. After implantation, 28 (72%) of them did not change grade and 11 (28%) progressed to grade 2. Regarding grade 2 TR before implantation in 8 patients (14%) – the TR grade decreased in 3 (37.5%) and did not change in the others. In 3 (5.4%) patients with grade 3 and 4 TR before the procedure, the TR decreased after procedure. Conclusion: Implantation of permanent RV leads did not worsen TR grade.

Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Due to Perforation by Permanent Pacemaker Lead

A Rare Case Report: Tricuspid Valve Prolapse Due to Spontaneous Chordae Rupture in a Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries Patient

Tricuspid Valve Dysfunction Due to Incarcerated Right Ventricular Lead

Severe tricuspid regurgitation due to interactions with right ventricular permanent pacemaker or defibrillator leads

An abnormal left ventricular-atrial perforation after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a case report

Life Threatening Right Ventricle and Atrium Perforation and Tricuspid Valve Injury Due to Pacemaker Lead Dislodgment- A Case Report

Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Implantation of a Pacemaker/Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Surgical Repair After Leadless Pacemaker-Induced Avulsion of Tricuspid Valve

Atrial Pacing Via Unilateral Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

Percutaneous Management of Atrium and Lung Perforation: A Case Report

Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator lead failure and revision following transcutaneous bicaval valve (TricValve®) implantation

Pacing and Defibrillation Consideration in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement

Pulmonary valve perforation with multiple cardiac anomalies: a case report

A case of tricuspid valve stenosis after pacemaker implantation with infective endocarditis

Association Between Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices and Tricuspid Regurgitation: a Case-Control Study.

Severe mitral regurgitation due to right ventricular apical pacing

Abstract 12929: Pacemaker Lead-induced Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With or Without RV Dilatation

Unintended Sequalae of Long-Term Transvenous Pacemaker Leads in a Patient With Congenital Heart Disease

Cardiac Pacemaker and the Effect on Hemodynamics of the Tricuspid Valve

Tricuspid Valve Incompetence Following Implantation of Ventricular Leads

Tricuspid Valve Replacement in a Patient with a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker: Current Guidelines and Recommendations for Perioperative Management