Tricuspid regurgitation associated with implantable electrical device insertion: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Rob Tatum,Elizabeth J. Maynes,Chelsey T. Wood,Avijit K. Deb,Melissa A. Austin,Thomas J. O'Malley,Jae Hwan Choi,H. Todd Massey,Rohinton J. Morris,Behzad B. Pavri,Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14287
2021-07-01
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Abstract:Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) lead placement may worsen or result in tricuspid regurgitation (TR). While the association between lead placement and the incidence of TR has been established, current understanding of this problem remains incomplete. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to pool the existing evidence to better understand the occurrence and severity of TR associated with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) insertion. Methods: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published from 2000 to 2018. Overall, 15 studies were selected for the analysis comprising 4,019 patients with data reported on TR development following ICD or PPM lead placement. Demographic information, perioperative clinical variables, and clinical outcome measures, including pre and postoperative echocardiographic TR grade changes, were extracted and pooled for systematic review. Results: Mean patient age was 69 years [95%CI: 64.62-73.59], and 63% [95% CI: 57-68] were male. Devices implanted included ICD in 57% [95%CI: 43-70] and PPM in 41% [95%CI: 31-52]. The most common indications for pacemaker implantation were sick sinus syndrome in 22% [95%CI: 22-37] and AV block in 21% [95%CI:12-34. The commonest indications for ICD implantation were primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Atrial fibrillation was present in 37% [95%CI: 28-46] and congestive heart failure in 15% [95%CI: 2-57]. Baseline distribution of TR grades were as follows: grade 0/1 TR in 89% [95%CI: 82-93], grade 2 TR in 8% [95%CI: 5-13], grade 3 TR in 2% [95%CI: 0-7] and grade 4 TR in 2% [95%CI: 1-4]. Post-procedure, grade 0/ 1 TR decreased to 68% [95%CI: 51-81] (p<0.01), grade 2 TR increased to 21% [15-28] (p< 0.01), grade 3 TR increased to 13% [95%CI: 5-32] (p = 0.02), and grade 4 TR increased to 7% [95%CI: 5-9] (p<0.01). Conclusion: ICD and PPM lead placement is associated with increased TR post-procedure. Further studies are warranted to evaluate changes in TR grade in the long term.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
engineering, biomedical,cardiac & cardiovascular systems