Abstract:Background: There is limited knowledge on outcome of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of leads being 20 and 30 years old. Methods: Retrospective single center large database analysis containing 3673 TLE procedures performed from 2006 to 2020 was analysed. We aimed to compare procedure complexity and the incidence of the TLE major complications (MC) in groups where extracted leads were under 10 years, 10-20 years, 20-30 years (old) and over 30 years (very old). Results: Rate of removal of old and very old leads almost doubles with successive five-year periods (3-6-10%). In patients with old and very old leads there is an accumulation of risk factors for major complications of TLE (young age, female, multiple and/or abandoned leads, multiple previous procedures). The removal of old and very old leads was more labour-consuming, more difficult, and much more often required second-line (advanced) tools and complex techniques. Incidence of all MC grew parallel to age of removed leads from 0.6 to 18.2%; haemopericardium-from 0.3 to 12.1%, severe tricuspid valve damage-from 0.2 to 2.1%, need for rescue cardiac surgery-from 0.4 to 9.1%. Notably, there was no procedure-related death when old or very old lead was extracted. The percentages of clinical and procedural success decreased with increasing age of the removed leads from 99.2 and 97.8% to 90.9 and 81.8%. The risk of MC during extraction of leads aged 10-20 years increases 6.7 times, aged 20-30 years-14.3 times (amounting to 8.4%), and aged 30 and more years-20.4 times, amounting to 18.2%. Removal of ventricular leads is associated with a greater complexity of the procedure but not with more frequent MC. Removal of the atrial leads is associated with a higher incidence of MC, especially haemopericardium, regardless of the age of the leads, although the tendency becomes less pronounced with the oldest leads. Conclusions: 1. Extraction of old and very old leads is a rising challenge, since the rate of removal of leads aged 20-and-more years almost doubles with successive five-year periods. 2. Procedure difficulty, complexity and the risk of major complications increases along with the age of extracted lead. TLE is more time-consuming, difficult and much more often requires advanced tools and complex techniques. 3. TLE of old (≥20 years) or very old (≥30 years) leads can be performed with satisfactory success rate and safety profile when conducted at high-volume centre by an experienced operator under optimal safety conditions.

Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Lead Perforation: A Single‐center Experience

Percutaneous Management of Atrium and Lung Perforation: A Case Report

Transvenous laser lead extraction in patients with congenital complete heart block

Hybrid technique in management of late lead right ventricular perforation

Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads-A Single-Center Experience

Clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with lead perforation

Trends and outcomes of inpatient cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extractions: a nationwide analysis

Comparison of outcomes and required tools between transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: Insight from single high‐volume center experience

Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study

Efficacy and Safety of Transvenous Lead Extraction in the Chinese Octogenarian Patients

Atrial lead perforation early after device implantation—a case report and literature review

Transfemoral Extraction of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Using Needle’s Eye Snare: a Single-Center Experience of More Than 900 Leads

Indications and outcomes of elective open chest lead extractions

Cardiac tamponade as an inherent but potentially nonfatal complication of transvenous lead extraction: Experience with 1126 procedures performed using mechanical tools

Re-evaluation of Transvenous Lead Extraction with Modified Standard Technique: a Prospective Study in 229 Patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Transvenous Lead Extraction at the Time of Upgrade from Pacemakers to Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Outcomes of Transvenous Extraction of Leads Older Than 20 and 30 Years-A Large Cohort Study

A Large Single-Center Clinical Trial of Transvenous Lead Extraction

Risk factors for severe complications of transvenous lead extraction

Practical Approaches to Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures-Clinical Case Series

Long‑term Outcomes of Non‑systematic Device Reimplantation Following Lead Extraction in Selected Patients