Abstract:Background: There is limited knowledge on outcome of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of leads being 20 and 30 years old. Methods: Retrospective single center large database analysis containing 3673 TLE procedures performed from 2006 to 2020 was analysed. We aimed to compare procedure complexity and the incidence of the TLE major complications (MC) in groups where extracted leads were under 10 years, 10-20 years, 20-30 years (old) and over 30 years (very old). Results: Rate of removal of old and very old leads almost doubles with successive five-year periods (3-6-10%). In patients with old and very old leads there is an accumulation of risk factors for major complications of TLE (young age, female, multiple and/or abandoned leads, multiple previous procedures). The removal of old and very old leads was more labour-consuming, more difficult, and much more often required second-line (advanced) tools and complex techniques. Incidence of all MC grew parallel to age of removed leads from 0.6 to 18.2%; haemopericardium-from 0.3 to 12.1%, severe tricuspid valve damage-from 0.2 to 2.1%, need for rescue cardiac surgery-from 0.4 to 9.1%. Notably, there was no procedure-related death when old or very old lead was extracted. The percentages of clinical and procedural success decreased with increasing age of the removed leads from 99.2 and 97.8% to 90.9 and 81.8%. The risk of MC during extraction of leads aged 10-20 years increases 6.7 times, aged 20-30 years-14.3 times (amounting to 8.4%), and aged 30 and more years-20.4 times, amounting to 18.2%. Removal of ventricular leads is associated with a greater complexity of the procedure but not with more frequent MC. Removal of the atrial leads is associated with a higher incidence of MC, especially haemopericardium, regardless of the age of the leads, although the tendency becomes less pronounced with the oldest leads. Conclusions: 1. Extraction of old and very old leads is a rising challenge, since the rate of removal of leads aged 20-and-more years almost doubles with successive five-year periods. 2. Procedure difficulty, complexity and the risk of major complications increases along with the age of extracted lead. TLE is more time-consuming, difficult and much more often requires advanced tools and complex techniques. 3. TLE of old (≥20 years) or very old (≥30 years) leads can be performed with satisfactory success rate and safety profile when conducted at high-volume centre by an experienced operator under optimal safety conditions.

Efficacy and Safety of Transvenous Lead Extraction in the Chinese Octogenarian Patients

Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study

Out with the old: Single center experience with transvenous extraction of leads older than 15 years

Outcomes of Transvenous Extraction of Leads Older Than 20 and 30 Years-A Large Cohort Study

Transvenous laser lead extraction in patients with congenital complete heart block

Clinical analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

Re-evaluation of Transvenous Lead Extraction with Modified Standard Technique: a Prospective Study in 229 Patients.

Comparison of outcomes and required tools between transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: Insight from single high‐volume center experience

Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Lead Perforation: A Single‐center Experience

A Large Single-Center Clinical Trial of Transvenous Lead Extraction

Preliminary Clinical Experience of Transveneous Extraction in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection

Indications and outcomes of elective open chest lead extractions

Efficacy and Safety of Transvenous Lead Extraction at the Time of Upgrade from Pacemakers to Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Implantable Defibrillator Lead Extraction with Optimized Standard Extraction Techniques

Mortality after transvenous lead extraction: A risk prediction model for sustainable care delivery

Transvenous Extraction and Removal of Pacing Leads Placed after Cardiac Transplantation

Safety of leadless pacemaker implantation in super-elderly patients

Percutaneous Extraction of Leads from Coronary Sinus Vein and Branch by Modified Techniques.

Transfemoral Extraction of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Using Needle’s Eye Snare: a Single-Center Experience of More Than 900 Leads

Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Device: The Impact of Systemic and Local Infection on Clinical Outcomes—An ESC-EHRA ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction Controlled) Registry Substudy

Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads-A Single-Center Experience