Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Open Nephrectomy for Radical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes
PENG Bo,ZHENG Jun-hua,XU Dan-feng,REN Ji-zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0258-879x.2006.11.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy for radical treatment of renal cancer.Methods: Fifty-three patients with renal cell carcinoma(due to receive radical renal tumor resection) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: retroperitoneal laparocopic(RL) group(n=27) and open approach(OA) group(n=26).The operation time,hospital stay,use of painkiller,fasting period after operation,and blood loss during operation were analyzed and compared.All the cases were followed up for 6-12 months and the survival rates,wound healing,and carcinoma metastasis were recorded.Results: Patients in both groups were all successfully treated and their sexes,clinical stages,ages,and tumor sizes were all comparable.The (operation) time was similar in the 2 groups,with that of RL group being(66.66±10.37) min and of OA group being((69.08±)(11.22) min.)The fasting period in RL group([1±0.36] d) was significantly shorter than that in the OA group([2±0.68] d,P0.05).The hospital stay in RL group(6.92±0.96) was significantly shorter than that in OA group(11.42±(1.57,) P0.05).The blood loss in RL group([72.03±19.37] ml) was less than that in OA group([154.4±20.42] ml,P0.01).The use of painkiller was 2 person-times in the RL group and 20 person-times in the OA group(P(0.01).) No post-operation infection was noticed in RL group and there was one case of infection in OA group during follow-up.Conclusion: Compared with traditional open radical nephrectomy,laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has the advantages of rapid recovery,less pain,less blood loss,and less complications,etc.