Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Heterogeneity of Strategy Persistence Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Heterogeneous Reputation Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Reputation-based Strategy Persistence Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma

Based on Reputation Consistent Strategy Times Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Heterogeneous preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoners’ dilemma game

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Heterogeneity of Reputation Increment Driven by Individual Influence Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma

The Effect Of Strategy Retention On Cooperation Based On Multi-Game In Complex Environment

How do reputation and conformity promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma?

Investigating the co-evolution of node reputation and edge-strategy in prisoner's dilemma game

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

The Interplay Between Reputation and Heterogeneous Investment Enhances Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Effect of Reputation-Based Heterogeneous Investment on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Strategy Imitation Behavior Driven Influence Adjustment Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

The influence of environment-based reputation on cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

The effects of heterogeneous confidence on cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Heterogeneous Game Resource Distributions Promote Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Diversity of rationality affects cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Reputation-based popularity promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.

Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game

Diversity of Game Strategies Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games