Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Investigating the co-evolution of node reputation and edge-strategy in prisoner's dilemma game

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game

Evolution of cooperation under the aspiration-based interactive diversity in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Understanding Cooperative Behavior Based on the Coevolution of Game Strategy and Link Weight

Evolution of Interactions and Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas

Evolutionary Dynamics under Interactive Diversity

The co-evolution of networks and prisoner's dilemma game by considering sensitivity and visibility

How do reputation and conformity promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma?

Aspiration-driven co-evolution of cooperation with individual behavioral diversity

Adaptive Co-Evolution of Strategies and Network Leading to Optimal Cooperation Level in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Coevolution of teaching ability and cooperation in spatial evolutionary games

Interactive diversity disrupts cyclic dominance but maintains cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Coevolution of relationship and interaction in cooperative dynamical multiplex networks

Evolution of cooperation with the diversity of cooperation tendencies

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation on interdependent networks with Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift Game

Diversity of Game Strategies Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games