Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

An evolutionary game with reputation-based imitation-mutation dynamics

The influence of environment-based reputation on cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Coevolution of teaching ability and cooperation in spatial evolutionary games

Cooperative Emergence of Spatial Public Goods Games with Reputation Discount Accumulation

The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game

Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game

Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks.

Cooperation dynamics of reputation-based manhattan distance social circle in spatial prisoner's dilemma game in evolutionary game theory

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Reputation and reciprocity

Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation

The evolutionary game of emotions considering the influence of reputation

Co-evolution of reputation-based preference selection and resource allocation with multigame on interdependent networks

Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas

How do reputation and conformity promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma?

The Evolution of Cooperation with Memory, Learning and Dynamic Preferential Selection in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game