Abstract:Reputations can foster cooperation by indirect reciprocity: if I am good to you then others will be good to me. But this mechanism for cooperation in one-shot interactions only works when people agree on who is good and who is bad. Errors in actions or assessments can produce disagreements about reputations, which can unravel the positive feedback loop between social standing and pro-social behaviour. Cooperators can end up punished and defectors rewarded. Public reputation systems and empathy are two possible mechanisms to promote agreement about reputations. Here we suggest an alternative: Bayesian reasoning by observers. By taking into account the probabilities of errors in action and observation and their prior beliefs about the prevalence of good people in the population, observers can use Bayesian reasoning to determine whether or not someone is good. To study this scenario, we develop an evolutionary game theoretical model in which players use Bayesian reasoning to assess reputations, either publicly or privately. We explore this model analytically and numerically for five social norms (Scoring, Shunning, Simple Standing, Staying, and Stern Judging). We systematically compare results to the case when agents do not use reasoning in determining reputations. We find that Bayesian reasoning reduces cooperation relative to non-reasoning, except in the case of the Scoring norm. Under Scoring, Bayesian reasoning can promote coexistence of three strategic types. Additionally, we study the effects of optimistic or pessimistic biases in individual beliefs about the degree of cooperation in the population. We find that optimism generally undermines cooperation whereas pessimism can, in some cases, promote cooperation. Cooperation is an important part of our social lives. However, selfish incentives can undermine it: I need not reciprocate with someone who has cooperated with me. One mechanism to promote cooperation is indirect reciprocity, wherein cooperation is rewarded by good reputations and defection punished by bad ones. This reward is provided indirectly, when other individuals cooperate with those of good reputation and defect against those with a bad reputation. Maintaining accurate reputations is a key part of this mechanism, since mistakes in evaluating others' behaviours and disagreements about reputations can undermine the feedback loop between reputations and cooperation. Here we develop a model of individual reasoning that can correct for such mistakes and disagreements, and we explore how this impacts the level of cooperation. We find that individual reasoning to determine accurate reputations can often undermine cooperation.

Reputation and reciprocity

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game

Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Indirect reciprocity with Bayesian reasoning and biases

The Evolution of Reputation-Based Cooperation in Regular Networks

Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks.

Cooperation and Reputation Dynamics with Reinforcement Learning

Dynamical reciprocity in interacting games: Numerical results and mechanism analysis

The influence of environment-based reputation on cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Indirect reciprocity in the public goods game with collective reputations

The evolutionary game of emotions considering the influence of reputation

Dynamic indirect reciprocity: The influence of personal reputation and group reputation on cooperative behavior in nested social dilemmas

Convergence of reputations under indirect reciprocity

How do reputation and conformity promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma?

Effect of reciprocity mechanisms on evolutionary dynamics in feedback-evolving games

Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review

Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas

Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation