Abstract:Land policy making is a complex systemic process in which new policies emerge and are nonlinearly transferred. However, challenges remain, as the recent policy diffusion literature cannot match policy making to complex adaptive systems. This study elucidates the conjunctural causal mechanisms of local policy innovation and diffusion in China. To analyze the differences in China's land reform, a theoretical framework is established that includes four key conditions-incentive rules, local context, vertical governmental coercion and interregional diffusion-as well as three analytical principles, namely, nonlinearity, conjunction and intersection. Then, an archetype analysis based on the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method is conducted on 119 city governments that implemented land retention policies during the period of 2000-2019. The results systematically associate local policy action with five theory-based archetypes, each with its own narrative expression ("risk aversion", "reform pilot", "political learning", "induced competition", and "social evolution"). This article reveals that 1) China's administrative institutional structure shapes the reform motivation of local governments and their interaction with the central government, and the performance evaluation system for officials plays a key role in this dynamic; 2) local contexts can limit or amplify coercive and learning mechanisms, and policy knowledge can impede diffusion under certain conditions; and 3) the combination of archetypes occurs at three levels: theoretical mechanisms, conditional elements, and factor combinations. Overall, the study shows how multilevel factor interactions influence the decision-making process for China's land reform. These findings can serve as useful references for conjunctural causation research on policy innovation and diffusion in China and assist local decision makers in other countries in transition in developing sustainable land policies.

Knowledge Production and Learning Model of Policy Experiment with Chinese Characteristics

Multi-party Interaction and Knowledge Production in Policy Experimentation ——A Case Study of Beijing's "Lawsuits Immediately Done After Receiving" Reform

Competitive Experimental Model of Policy Innovation in China Chinese Full Text

Experience Summary and Theoretical Connotation of 'Hangzhou Model'

Experiment-based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? the Case of Urban Housing Reform in China

Policy Experimentation,Iterative Learning and Governance Transformation——A Case Study of Sub-District Management Reform in Beijing

Policy Experiments:Start -up Mechanisms and Internal Logic---Case Studies on the Performance Management Policies in China’s Public Sectors

‘FROM POINT TO SURFACE’: THE ROLE OF POLICY EXPERIMENTATION IN CHINESE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS

Experimentation, Policy Learning, and China's Education Reforms

Land Policy Making in a Complex System: the Innovation and Diffusion Logic of China's Retained Land Policy Reform

Experimental Evaluation Model of Ambiguous Policy:Taking the Construction of National Pilot Zones for Ecological Civilization as an Example

Development of the theoretical model on knowledge translation from health technology assessment to health policy in China

Behavioral Patterns of Expert Participation in Social Policy Changes in China

Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central–Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China

Dual-track Approach to Policy Experiment: The Experience of Policy Innovation in China

Evolutionary "China Model":Strategy,Governance,and Frame

Policy Experimentation and Power Negotiation in China’s Higher Education Reforms

Policy Experimentation As Communication with the Public: Social Policy, Shared Responsibility and Regime Support in China

China’s Experience in Public Policy Implementation

State Capacity in China's Innovation Subsidy Policy: A Perspective on Government Knowledge

Policy experimentation and innovation as a response to complexity in China’s management of health reforms