Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Evolutionary "China Model":Strategy,Governance,and Frame

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

A Dynamic China Model: the Co-Evolution of Economics and Politics in China

Chinese Political and Economic Governance System and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment

The Transformation of China's Development Model

China's Transition and Development Model Under Evolving Regional Competition Patterns

From the Beijing Consensus to the China Model: A Suggested Strategy for Future Economic Reform

A “Model” with No Model

China’s Development Modeli:the Costs and Benefits of the Decentralization Approach to Transition

Convergence or Divergence: On the Evolution Tendency of Corporate Governance Models in Globalization

From One-Level Games to Two-Level Games:The Evolution of China’s Foreign Policy-Making Model

China’s Governance Model and System in Transition

Dual Binary Transition and Structural Adjustment: Model,Propositions,and Evidence from China

Co-evolutionary Pragmatism: Re-examine ‘china Model' and Its Impact on Developing Countries

The Wenzhou Model of China’s Civil Society Development

A Political-economic Analysis of China's Economic Model

From Double Creation to Mutual Configuration——The Chinese Experience of Constructing Government-Market Relations

Coping with Growth in China: Comparing Models of Development in Guangdong and Chongqing

Understanding Economic Development and Institutional Change: East Asian Development Model Reconsidered with Implications for China

China’s reform and opening process: a new model of political economy?

Political development in China: duet-variation of theory and practice