Numerical Analysis for a Novel Cooling Protection Scheme with Rail Crown Holes and Streamwise Divider Wall for the Squealer Tip in a Turbine Blade
Haimeng Zhou,Lei Luo,Han Yan,Wei Du,Songtao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.107815
IF: 6.782
2024-01-01
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Abstract:The squealer tip with rail crown holes (RCH) is a new tip scheme with excellent comprehensive performance in both tip cooling and leakage flow control in the turbine blade. The coolant radially impacts the leakage flow within the limited clearance space, significantly reducing the leakage flow rate (LFR). Moreover, the coolant ejected from the RCH can simultaneously cover both the rail crown surface (RCS) and cavity floor (CF), achieving efficient utilization of coolant. However, the secondary utilization of coolant within the cavity is very limited. In this study, the streamwise divider wall (SDW) is added inside the cavity to enhance the coolant reattachment on the CF, which can further improve the performance of the squealer tip. The effect of the shape and position of the SDW on the aerodynamic and cooling performance of the tip is investigated, and the evaluation indicators are LFR and film cooling efficiency (eta), respectively. Numerical results prove that the SDW significantly enhances the contact effect between the coolant and cavity surface, compared with the Baseline, the average eta on the CF increases by 41.76% in the camber line SDW scheme (Case 1). By altering the SDW shape, it is evident that the cavity flow can be reasonably organized by the front part of the SDW, the middle part of the SDW can scrape the pass-over coolant and limit the scraped coolant to the pressure-side cavity, and the rear part of the SDW effectively prevent the accumulation of cavity flow to ensure better coolant filling. As the SDW is shifted towards the pressure-side rail, the eta on the tip surface is improved overall. In addition, the position and shape of the SDW have little effect on the total LFR, but have a significant impact on the LFR distribution. In Case 1, the leakage flow can better integrate with the mainstream in the downstream passage, which reduces the pressure gradient in the passage, and thus reduce passage loss.