Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability and main influencing factors of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) using radiographs that had not been premeasured.METHODS:Fifty-six patients with IS, 9 male and 47 female, aged 15.4 (11 - 18), underwent preoperative X-ray photography of spine standing full-length posteroanterior and lateral films and left and right supine side-bending radiographs. The films were read by four orthopedic surgeons independently to do measurement and typing according to the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems respectively. Two weeks later, the sequence of the X-ray films was re-ordered and the 4 surgeons read them and did measurement and typing once more. The average percentage of intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated. Kappa coefficients were used to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability.RESULTS:King classification demonstrated fair interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 65.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.542), while the intraobserver reliability was 82.6% (Kappa coefficient = 0.767). The main reason of disagreement was distinguishment of the King type II and type III. Another reason was assessment of King type V. The complete Lenke classification demonstrated poor reliability. The mean interobserver reliability was 50.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.438), and the intraobserver reliability was 47.0% (Kappa coefficient = 0.402). The 3 components of Lenke classification had fair interobserver and intraobserver reliability when they were examined separately. The main reasons for disagreement arose from judging whether there was a structural upper thoracic curve and assigning sagittal thoracic modifier. The PUMC type demonstrated excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability with a mean interobserver reliability of 87.8% (Kappa coefficient = 0.757), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 92.9% (Kappa coefficient = 0.958). Its subtypes demonstrated fair agreement with the mean interobserver reliability of 70.2% (Kappa coefficient = 0.629), and a mean intraobserver reliability of 74.1% (Kappa coefficient = 0.674). The main reasons for disagreement were definition of a curvature and Cobb angle measurement.CONCLUSION:King and PUMC classification systems have higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability than Lenke classification. The reliability levels of the 3 classification systems are all influenced by many factors. Judgment of an upper thoracic curve, variable of Cobb angle measurement, and relationship of the central vertical sagittal line to apex of curve are the common reasons for disagreement in these 3 classifications.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Sirveaux Classification of Scapular Notching After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Inter-rater and intrarater reliability of superior labrum anterior to posterior lesion classification using magnetic resonance arthrography

Complication Severity Score for Growth-friendly Surgery Has Strong Interrater and Intrarater Agreement

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the New SRS-Schwab Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

Modified notching classification in inverted-bearing and conventional-bearing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Evaluating inter- and intraobserver reliability in radiographic determination of wrist alignment following scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis

Owen, Sugaya, and Hayashida Classifications Give Poor Intra- and Inter-Rater Agreement on a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Subscapularis Tendon Retears

Revising the Modified Neer Classification for Distal Clavicle Fractures: Description and Reliability.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Spinal Deformity Study Group classification of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis

[Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC Classification Systems for Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Association of Preoperative Shoulder Osteoarthritis Severity Score With Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score at 2 Years After Rotator Cuff Repair

Impact of scapular notching on glenoid fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vitro and finite element study

Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures

AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study

The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons

Reproducibility of the Mayo and Schatzker classification systems in proximal ulna fractures