Abstract:Abstract Background To achieve the proper sagittal alignment, previous studies have developed different assessment systems for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) which could help the spine surgeon in making treatment strategies. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether Roussouly classification or global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is more appropriate in the prediction of mechanical complications after surgical treatment of ADS. Methods ADS patients who received long segmental fusion in the treatment during the period from December 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated in this study. Basic information and radiologic measurements were collected for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to occurrence or absence of mechanical complications for comparison. Mechanical complications included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF). GAP categories divided GAP score into proportioned spinopelvic position, moderately disproportioned position, and severely disproportioned position according to the cut-off values. The correlation between evaluation systems and mechanical complications was analyzed through a logistic regression model via stepwise backward elimination based on the Wald statistics. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predictability of the evaluation systems in the occurrence of mechanical complications and calculate their cut-off value. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the validity of the thresholds. Results A total of 80 patients were included in this study. There were 41 patients in mechanical complication group and 39 patients in no mechanical complication group. GAP score ( P = 0.008) and GAP categories ( P = 0.007) were positively correlated with mechanical complications; Roussouly score was negatively correlated with mechanical complications ( P = 0.034); GAP score was positively correlated with PJK ( P = 0.021); Roussouly score was negatively correlated with implant-related complications ( P = 0.018); GAP categories were correlated with implant loosening ( P = 0.023). Results of ROC showed that GAP score was more effective in predicting PJK (AUC = 0.863) and PJF (AUC = 0.724) than Roussouly score; GAP categories (AUC = 0.561) was more effective than GAP score (AUC = 0.555) in predicting implant-related complications. Conclusions Roussouly classification could only be a rough estimate of optimal spinopelvic alignment. Quantitative parameters in GAP score made it more effective in predicting mechanical complications, PJK and PJF than Roussouly classification.

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the New SRS-Schwab Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification for L5-S1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Spinal Deformity Study Group classification of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

Toward the Development of a Comprehensive Clinically Oriented Patient Profile: A Systematic Review of the Purpose, Characteristic, and Methodological Quality of Classification Systems of Adult Spinal Deformity

Bracing in adult with scoliosis: experience in diagnosis and classification from a 15 year prospective study of 739 patients

Spinopelvic Changes Based on the Simplified SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: Relationships With Disability and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Prolonged Degenerative Spinal Disorders

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Roussouly classification of adult spinal deformity

Reassessment System and Staged Surgical Strategy with Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treatment of Severe Adult Spinal Deformities

New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization

Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline

Reproducibility and reliability analysis of French and CARDS classification in degenerative spondylolisthesis

Complication Severity Score for Growth-friendly Surgery Has Strong Interrater and Intrarater Agreement

Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification

A Lumbar Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult Patient: Preliminary Approach

Comparison of SDSG and CARDS Classifications for L5/S1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: an Independent Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Study

A Study on Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of the Huashan Radiologic Classification System for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Fracture and Dislocation

Reliability of End, Stable, Neutral, First Coronal Reverse Vertebrae Identification in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: Intra- and Interobserver Consistency Analysis.

Characterizing Adult Cervical Deformity and Disability Based on Existing Cervical and Adult Deformity Classification Schemes at Presentation and Following Correction