Abstract:Abstract Background To achieve the proper sagittal alignment, previous studies have developed different assessment systems for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) which could help the spine surgeon in making treatment strategies. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether Roussouly classification or global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is more appropriate in the prediction of mechanical complications after surgical treatment of ADS. Methods ADS patients who received long segmental fusion in the treatment during the period from December 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated in this study. Basic information and radiologic measurements were collected for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to occurrence or absence of mechanical complications for comparison. Mechanical complications included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF). GAP categories divided GAP score into proportioned spinopelvic position, moderately disproportioned position, and severely disproportioned position according to the cut-off values. The correlation between evaluation systems and mechanical complications was analyzed through a logistic regression model via stepwise backward elimination based on the Wald statistics. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predictability of the evaluation systems in the occurrence of mechanical complications and calculate their cut-off value. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the validity of the thresholds. Results A total of 80 patients were included in this study. There were 41 patients in mechanical complication group and 39 patients in no mechanical complication group. GAP score ( P = 0.008) and GAP categories ( P = 0.007) were positively correlated with mechanical complications; Roussouly score was negatively correlated with mechanical complications ( P = 0.034); GAP score was positively correlated with PJK ( P = 0.021); Roussouly score was negatively correlated with implant-related complications ( P = 0.018); GAP categories were correlated with implant loosening ( P = 0.023). Results of ROC showed that GAP score was more effective in predicting PJK (AUC = 0.863) and PJF (AUC = 0.724) than Roussouly score; GAP categories (AUC = 0.561) was more effective than GAP score (AUC = 0.555) in predicting implant-related complications. Conclusions Roussouly classification could only be a rough estimate of optimal spinopelvic alignment. Quantitative parameters in GAP score made it more effective in predicting mechanical complications, PJK and PJF than Roussouly classification.

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

Decision-making factors in the treatment of adult spinal deformity

Counseling Guidelines for Anticipated Postsurgical Improvements in Pain, Function, Mental Health, and Self-image for Different Types of Adult Spinal Deformity

The Scoliosis Research Society adult spinal deformity standard outcome set

Development of patient-reported outcome for adult spinal deformity: validation study

An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity

Toward the Development of a Comprehensive Clinically Oriented Patient Profile: A Systematic Review of the Purpose, Characteristic, and Methodological Quality of Classification Systems of Adult Spinal Deformity

Reassessment System and Staged Surgical Strategy with Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treatment of Severe Adult Spinal Deformities

Stronger association of objective physical metrics with baseline patient-reported outcome measures than preoperative standing sagittal parameters for adult spinal deformity patients

Classification of Adult Spinal Deformity: Review of Current Concepts and Future Directions

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Validation of Sagittal age-adjusted Score in Predicting Proximal Junctional Kyphosis/Failure and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

External Validation of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) in the Scoli-RISK-1 Patient Database

Independent Prognostic Factors Associated with Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Prospective Evaluation of Elderly Deformity Surgery (PEEDS) Study

Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline

Utility of the MISDEF2 Algorithm and Extent of Fusion in Open Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Potential of predictive computer models for preoperative patient selection to enhance overall quality-adjusted life years gained at 2-year follow-up: a simulation in 234 patients with adult spinal deformity

Use of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) to Predict Major Complications in the Scoli-Risk 1 Multicenter, International Patient Database

Comparison of Patients with and without Predicted Surgical Indication between Clusters of Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) Patients

Validation and Reliability Analysis of the New SRS-Schwab Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity

Importance of modifiable non-radiographic functional parameters for adult spinal deformity