Abstract:BackgroundTrochanteric fractures usually require surgical treatment. The currently used classification system, such as AO classification, cannot cover all variant types, and is poor in reliability, causing confusion in surgical decision making. This study describes a simple, well-covered, re-liable, accurate, and clinically useful classification.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 907 patients with trochanteric fractures treated by us from 1,999 to 2019 and proposed a new classification according to radiographs. Then, 50 records randomly selected in proportion were examined by 10 observers (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) independently according to AO and the new classification. After a 2-week interval, repeat evaluation was completed. The Kappa coefficient was used to investigate the intra-observer reliability, inter-observer reliability and the agreement between the observers and the “reference standard”.ResultsThe new classification system includes 12 types composed of 3 medial groups and 4 lateral groups. According to the medial buttress, the fractures are divided into group I (intact lesser trochanter, adequate but-tress), group II (incomplete lesser trochanter, effective cortical buttress after reduction) and group III (huge defect of the medial cortex). According to the penetration region of the lateral fracture line, the fractures are divided into group A (intact lateral cortex), group B (incomplete lateral cortex), group C (subtrochanteric fractures) and group D (multiple lateral fracture lines). All of the included cases can be classified according to the new classification, of which 34 (3.75%) cases are unclassifiable by the AO classification. Intra-observer: The experienced achieved substantial agreement using both AO [k = 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.46–0.76)] and new classification [k = 0.65 (0.55–0.76)]. The inexperienced reached moderate agreement using both AO [k = 0.48 (0.33–0.62)] and new classification [k = 0.60 (0.50–0.71)]. Inter-observer: The overall reliabilities for AO [k = 0.51 (0.49–0.53)] and for new classification [k = 0.57 (0.55–0.58)] were both moderate. The agreement between the experienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.61 (0.49–0.74)] and new classification [k = 0.63 (0.54–0.72)] were both substantial. The agreement between the inexperienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.48 (0.45–0.50)] and the new classification [k = 0.48 (0.41–0.54)] were both moderate.ConclusionCompared with AO classification, our new classification is better in coverage, reliability and accuracy, and has the feasibility of clinical verification and promotion.

Clinical pathological conference: The Children's Medical Center, Boston, Mass.

Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

Newer data obtainable from the blood film: methods of examination and significance of findings.

The role of the kidney in canine blood pressure control: direct assessment of the closed‐loop gain.

Antimitochondrial Autoantibodies in Pemphigus Vulgaris

A Novel Fragment Specific Classification of Complex Olecranon Fractures: 3D Model Design, Radiological Validation and Proposed Surgical Algorithm

Respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A infections in the hospitalized elderly.

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION

Effect of clinician's experience and expertise on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the computed tomography-based classification systems in posterior malleolus fractures

Revising the Modified Neer Classification for Distal Clavicle Fractures: Description and Reliability.

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility of Classifications of Tibial Plateau Fractures and the Surgical Approaches Chosen Comparing 2D CT and 3D Printing: Reliability Study

The Reliability and Accuracy of the Medial Malleolar Fracture Classification Based on <scp>3D CT</scp> Reconstruction

Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

Proposal and Validation of a New Classification for Trochanteric Fractures Based on Medial Buttress and Lateral Cortical Integrity.

The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures

Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities and critical analysis of the osteoporotic fracture classification of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures

Hypophysectomy and heart size.